My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-03-2017 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2017
>
05-03-2017 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2017 12:19:41 PM
Creation date
6/7/2017 12:12:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for May 3, 2017 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2017\PC 17-010 - 3246 New Brighton Road - Preliminary Plat & Variance\Memos_Reports_17-010\PC Report_(5- <br />3-17)_17-010.docx <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />1. Purpose and Intent. The Variance request shall comply with the purpose and intent of the <br />provisions of City's Zoning Regulations and with the policies of the City's <br />Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that one and one-half to three units <br />per acre is allowed in the Very Low Density Residential land use district. The proposed <br />density of the subdivision is 2.60 units per net acre. Should the Comprehensive Plan be <br />amended to Very Low Density Residential, then this criterion would be met. Require the <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br /> <br />2. Practical Difficulties. The applicant for a Variance shall establish that there are practical <br />difficulties in complying with the provisions of the Arden Hills Zoning Regulations. The <br />following criteria apply to this application: <br /> <br />a) Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable <br />manner not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. A single family home with allowed <br />accessory structure can be constructed on an 81.75 foot wide lot and would be a <br />reasonable use of the property. Criterion met. <br /> <br />b) Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances unique <br />to the property not created by the landowner. The property has been used as a fire <br />station for decades and it is assumed that forethought into the eventual <br />redevelopment of the property into residential lots did not occur. Criterion met. <br /> <br />c) Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood. There are a number of lots within this block that have <br />lot widths less than the required 85 feet, but the majority of the lots on this block are <br />85 feet wide or greater. Planning Commission determination needed. <br /> <br />d) Economic Consideration. Economic consideration alone does not constitute a <br />practical difficulty. The practical difficulty could be the difficulty of converting a <br />property designed as a fire station into a residential subdivision. Planning <br />Commission determination needed. <br /> <br />e) Access to Sunlight. Inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems shall <br />be considered a practical difficulty. The lots face southwest and have adequate access <br />to sunlight. Not Applicable. <br /> <br />Additional Review <br /> <br />Building Official and Fire Marshal <br />The Building Official has reviewed the application and does not have any objections to the <br />proposed project. Since this is a property owned by the Fire Department, the Fire Marshal is <br />recusing himself from commenting on the proposed project. All final plans will be subject to the <br />Building Official and Fire Marshal’s approval prior to the issuance of any permits. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.