Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> The decision also noted that the town board members did not appear to make <br />any decisions in their e-mail messages. <br /> Because this decision is unpublished, it is not binding on other courts. In <br />addition, the outcome of this decision might have been different if the <br />substance of the e-mails had related to something other than operational <br />matters, for example, if the substance of the e-mails were attempting to build <br />agreement on a particular issue that was going to be presented to the town <br />board at a future meeting. <br />See LMC information memo, <br />Electronic Communications <br />Between Councilmembers. <br />IPAD 09-020. <br />In addition, serial discussions between less than a quorum of the council <br />could violate the open meeting law. As a result, city councils and other <br />public bodies should take a conservative approach and should not use e- <br />mail, telephone calls, and other technology to communicate back and forth <br />with other members of the public body if both of the following <br />circumstances exist: <br /> • A quorum of the council or public body will be contacted regarding the <br />same matter. <br />• City business is being discussed. <br />Minn. Stat. § 13.02, subd. 7. Another thing councilmembers should be careful about is which e-mail <br />account they use to receive e-mails relating to city business because such e- <br />mails would likely be considered government data that is subject to a public- <br />records requests under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. The <br />best option is for each councilmember to have an individual e-mail account <br />that the city provides and city staff or contracted staff manage. However, <br />this is not always possible for cities due to budget, size, or logistics. <br /> If councilmembers don’t have a city e-mail account, there are some things to <br />think about before using a personal e-mail address for city business. First, <br />preferably only the councilmember has access to the personal e-mail. Using <br />a shared account with other family members could lead to incorrect <br />information being communicated from the account, or incoming information <br />being inadvertently deleted. Also, since city e-mails are government data, <br />city officials may have to separate personal e-mails from city e-mails when <br />responding to a public-records request. <br /> Second, is the account you want to use for city business tied to your private <br />employer? Most likely your employer has a policy that restricts this kind of <br />use. However, it your employer allows this type of use, be aware that in the <br />event of a public-records request or litigation request, your employer may be <br />compelled to have a search done of your company e-mail or to restore files <br />from a backup or archive. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Handbook for Minnesota Cities 10/14/2013 <br />Meetings, Motions, Resolutions, and Ordinances Chapter 7 | Page 19