Laserfiche WebLink
In the below image, I wanted to highlight how close the proposed 40' retaining wall is to the actual lift station (not just the easement... but the lift station <br />itself). The 40' long retaining wall is only a couple of feet from the lift station. Any work on the list station would surely be made more difficult and/or <br />costly due to this wall - the construction company that previously built the lift station indicated they would simply have to tear it out and rebuild it. <br />Who pays when it's damaged by lift station rebuilds and/or simple maintenance work? Who pays when the retaining wall ages and eventually fails and the <br />lift station is damaged / compromised because of it? I imagine the city would end up paying these costs. These are "when" questions, not "if" questions. <br />A catch basin would be at the base of this wall with a pipe that runs to the filtration basin. The full impact might not be had from this angle but the <br />adjacency should come through. These items were also on the list of things that would have to be removed and then rebuilt (at the city's expense) for a lift <br />station rebuild and/or maintenance work on the lines in the area. <br />Page 4 of 12Reasons to Deny 3685 New Brighton Road Subdivision <br />3/9/2018http://joefederer.com/subdivision/Reasons.html