Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for May 9, 2018 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2018\PC 18-009 - 1290 County Road F - Site Plan Review\Memos_Reports_18-009 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />neighborhood and the community as a whole. Staff offers the following findings of fact for <br />consideration: <br />1. The property at 1290 County Road F West is located in the R-4 – Multiple Dwelling <br />District and in Sign District 3. <br />2. Section 1250.02 of the Sign Code allows the property to display one temporary wall sign <br />with a maximum area of 10 square feet for a maximum duration of 30 days per calendar <br />year. <br />3. Section 1250.02 of the Sign Code allows buildings or parcels with space for lease to have <br />one temporary wall sign up to 25 square feet in size to be displayed until seven days after <br />a building or parcel is fully leased. <br />4. The applicant has proposed installing one temporary wall sign measuring 240 square feet <br />in area on the south building elevation facing Interstate 694 and one temporary wall sign <br />measuring 198 square feet in area on the north building elevation facing County Road F <br />West. <br />5. The applicant has proposed displaying the two temporary wall signs from the date a Sign <br />Permit is issued until November 1, 2018. <br />6. Section 1260 of the Sign Code permits deviation from the Sign Code through the Site <br />Plan Review process. <br />7. The permitted size of temporary wall signs may limit the owner’s ability to effectively <br />advertise the availability of apartment units for rent given the size of the building and the <br />distance the building is setback from Interstate 694 and County Road F West. <br />8. The applicant has requested to extend the duration of time that the temporary wall signs <br />can be displayed due to the expected decrease in traffic as a result of the County Road F <br />West reconstruction project. <br />9. The proposed signs would not be in direct view from residential properties. <br />10. The sign standard adjustment is not expected to result in signs that are inconsistent with <br />the purpose of the R-4 – Multiple Dwelling District. <br />11. The proposed signs are not expected to have a negative impact on adjacent properties or <br />the City as a whole. <br /> <br /> <br />Options and Motion Language <br /> <br />Staff has provided the following options and motion language for this case. The Planning <br />Commission should consider providing additional findings of fact as part of the motion to <br />support their recommendation for approval or denial. <br /> <br />• Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning <br />Case 18-009 for a Site Plan Review for a Sign Standard Adjustment at 1290 County Road <br />F West, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the six (6) <br />conditions in the May 9, 2018 Report to the Planning Commission: <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended <br />by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined