My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-18-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
05-21-18-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2018 8:47:48 AM
Creation date
6/13/2018 8:46:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AR -DEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — MAY 21, 2018 3 <br />Discussion ensued regarding the possible need for controlled intersections at the parking lot exits <br />and a possible separate entrance to the housing area. <br />City Planner Bachler confirmed that the property would have to be built as a PUD, and it is <br />currently zoned R-1. <br />Councilmember Dave McClung stated he has all of the same concerns as he did with the <br />previous plan; traffic, density and height. <br />Councilmember Holden felt it would be a good use of the land, that traffic is not an issue, and <br />the project would be an asset to the community. <br />Councilmember Scott said he was not opposed to the project, but did have concerns about traffic. <br />Mayor Grant noted the building height being lowered mitigates a previous concern of his, and he <br />was not opposed to the project. He felt the traffic issues are probably resolveable. He encouraged <br />the Lyngblomsten team to contact Councilmember Fran Holmes for her opinion on the project. <br />C. Committees and Commissions — Joint Works Sessions with Council <br />City Administrator Dave Perrault gave comments from Councilmember Holmes; she enjoys the <br />joint work sessions and wants them to continue on an annual basis but the presentation should be <br />limited to half an hour and only the chair should speak. <br />After discussion, it was determined that the Council would like to continue to have a joint work <br />session with the Planning Commission, but the other committees and commissions could work <br />with the Council liaisons rather than come before the whole Council. <br />D. Utility Bonding <br />City Administrator Perrault reminded the Council that Ehler's had given bonding <br />recommendations and the Council had requested other scenarios with varying levels of debt. <br />Councilmember Holden said she would like to look at the capital projects again to see if there is <br />anything they want to change before they do the bonding. She noted the amount of interest that <br />would need to be paid on each scenario. <br />Mayor Grant favored scenario A. <br />Councilmember Holden said she would like to strike the $200,000 for sewer lining in 2018 and <br />use scenario A. <br />Councilmember Scott leaned toward scenario B with the sewer lining as is. <br />Councilmember McClung was comfortable with scenario B. <br />Mayor Grant suggested taking out the sewer lining and bond an amount somewhere between <br />scenario A and B. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.