My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-16-18-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
07-16-18-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 11:18:28 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 11:18:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION - JULY 16, 2018 <br />includes additional restrictions on tree and vegetation removal within the Shore Impact Zone and <br />on steep slopes in the Shoreland Management District' <br />City planner Bachler explained to mitigate the impacts of the removal of significant trees, the <br />City has adopted a Tree preservation Ordinance (Section 1325.055). A Tree Preservation Plan is <br />required as part of an application for new building construction, expansion of an existing building <br />or hard rrriu." by 10 percent or more, projects that requires a Grading and Erosion Control <br />permit, and for a plat or'minor subdivision. The Tree Preservation Ordinance does not prohibit the <br />removal of significant trees, but it does give the City authority to work with a property owner to <br />designate certain trees for preservation and to require replacement tree plantings. <br />City Attorney Joel Jamnik explained he had a difficult time finding an ordinance that addressed <br />vegltation removal and clear cutting. He commented further on how these ordinances handle <br />violations and discussed the propo..d fines. He was of the opinion courts would not impose the <br />full $1,000 fine. He anticipated a $300-400 fine could be imposed on a first-time offense. He <br />reported staff could fashion language to address landscape enhancements and clear cutting that <br />would have to occur for this type of activity' <br />Councilmember Holden discussed the amount of time the City spends addressing homeowners <br />along Lake Johanna that have cleared large amounts of vegetation. <br />City Attorney Jamnik commented cleanup costs could be abated back to a homeowner, but <br />noted staff and attorneys' fees would be difficult to recover' <br />City planner Bachler stated one of the difficulties facing the City at this time was defining clear <br />cutting. <br />Councilmember Holden recommended information regarding clear cutting and vegetative <br />removal be included in the new resident packet, along with being posted on the City's website' <br />She explained she was really .onr.*.d with the clear cutting that was occulring on Lake <br />Johanna. <br />City Attorney Jamnik reported it would be difficult to close the loopholes that are occurring now <br />without stricter enforcement on the City's pat. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the Thom Drive situation. <br />Councilmember Fran Holmes stated she did not believe the Thom Drive issue was a concern' <br />Councilmember Holden expressed concern with how the Thom Drive property was clear cut <br />prior to seeking approval to the City for the subdivision' <br />City Attorney Jamnik commented if the City Council was interested, staff could continue to <br />*oik on this to address intensive vegetation removal, separate from a development or landscaping <br />activity. Secondarily, he would also address holding up building permits and certificates of <br />occupancy if a restoration order was necessary'
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.