My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-16-18-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
07-16-18-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 11:18:28 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 11:18:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COI.]NCIL WORK SESSION - JULY 16, 20 I8 <br />Councilmember Holden supported staff proceeding in this manner. She also recommended <br />lakeshore owners be notified of the proposed changes coming to this Ordinance. <br />City Attorney Jamnik recommended information not be provided to homeowners until the <br />Ordinance amendments were more finalized. <br />Councilmember Holmes asked that staff also better define the City's definition of clear cutting. <br />Council consensus was to direct staff to continue working on this item and report back at the <br />August work session meeting. <br />B. SLWA <br />City Administrator Dave Perrault explained at the June I 1,2018 City Council meeting the City <br />Council directed staff to bring back the SLWA marketing agreement for further discussion. Per <br />the agreement, the City is obligated to do at least two campaigns per year for three years. The <br />original agreement allows the company to use the City's logo. The next mailing is set for the fall <br />(daies have not yet been set). If the City would like SLWA to change their marketing material, one <br />option SLWA presented was a co-branded mailing. SLWA is willing to consider other options at <br />the City's request, but would still like the City to commit to future mailings. <br />Councilmember Holden expressed concem with the fact SLWA sent bad information to the <br />City's residents in their first mailing. She believed City staff needed to talk with their legal team' <br />Shi was of the opinion SLWA needed to get their act together prior to the City moving forward <br />with a second mailing. <br />Mayor Grant asked if the City Council would have to approval power over a second letter. <br />City Administrator Perrault reported this was the case. <br />Mayor Grant recommended staff inform SLWA that the City would be diligently reviewing any <br />future letters. <br />Councilmember Steve Scott stated he was irked when he received the previous mailing. He <br />feared the mailing appeared to be the City trying to sell a service. He recommended language be <br />placed in the next letter stating the City has partnered with SLWA. <br />Mayor Grant commented this language would not be correct either because the City has not <br />partnered with SLWA. Rather, the City has permitted SLWA to offer insurance in the City. <br />Councilmember Holden stated there was no difference between SLWA and the clothing <br />recycling company that was completing pickups in the City. <br />Mayor Grant noted the clothing recycling pickup was completed at no cost to homeowners. <br />City Planner Bachler reported this was the case.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).