Laserfiche WebLink
3 lots, Same developer as 3685, We had issues with the way the lots were graded and still <br />have some concerns about a current build going up west of our property. Also, In hindsite, <br />the decision to sub divide the existing lot at 1998 where we built, into 3 lots instead of 2 was <br />also non conforming and resulted in some justifiably unhappy neighbors. <br />It would be wrong to make the same mistake a second time. <br />Our hopes are that, in spite of our strong opposition to the proposed plan , that if <br />approved the city will be very diligent in making sure all the building regulations are <br />followed,including the replanting of trees at that location and full payment of the "park <br />dedication " fee. <br />To sum it up. We feel that having 3 homes on that divided lot is detrimental and non- <br />conforming to our neighborhood. There are risks involved with the upkeep and maintenance <br />of the wetlands that are part of RCWD. Also a vacation of any easement sets a bad precedent <br />for any future requests for any easement vacation. <br />There is no way to deny the fact that the plan poses a significant risk to to the drainage and <br />utility easements in place there. <br />Brian and Jane Jorgenson <br />1978 Thom Drive <br />Arden Hills <br /> <br />