Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – February 7, 2018 7 <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones questioned how the maintenance agreement for the storm basins would be <br />handled by the developer. <br /> <br />Paul Cherne, Pioneer Engineering, stated the maintenance agreement would run with the land. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson requested further information on how the storm basins will be graded. <br /> <br />Mr. Cherne discussed how the basins would be graded and seeded for the development. He <br />reported these basins were not complicated but would simply be used for holding and discharge <br />to the wetlands. He explained the maintenance for the basin would be quite minimal and would <br />simply involve keeping the pipe free and clear of debris. He noted no street runoff would be <br />managed by the storm basins on Lot 1. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth asked if the grading on the property would have a natural grade. <br /> <br />Mr. Cherne described how the site would be graded and noted one pipe would be needed for <br />one of the driveways. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dixon requested staff summarize the list of variances needed to approve this <br />Planning Case. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler stated this request has no variances and noted all of the lots met the City’s <br />minimum size requirements. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dixon asked if the City could successfully replace the lift station in 20 or 50 <br />years with the proposed development in place. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler explained that staff has reviewed the proposed plans and believes the lift <br />station could be successfully reconstructed with the reduced easement area and the addition of <br />the two new homes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gehrig thanked staff for providing the Commission with additional information <br />from the Rice Creek Watershed District and on the basin maintenance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones stated the Commission did not really have a leg to stand on in order to <br />deny the request, given the fact the applicant had not requested any variances and the proposed <br />development met all City requirements. <br /> <br />Chair Thompson indicated this was the case and noted the final decision for this request would <br />be made by the City Council where the comments and concerns expressed by the neighbors <br />would have to be considered. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones requested that staff take a closer look at the tree preservation plan to <br />address the concern expressed by Mr. Federer this evening. <br /> <br />City Planner Bachler discussed the tree preservation plan and noted all diseased trees had been <br />removed from the City’s calculations. He commented further on the bond the City would require <br />for the new tree plantings on the site. He noted if trees that are to be protected are removed or