My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-19-SWS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
01-16-19-SWS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2024 4:56:38 PM
Creation date
1/10/2019 2:47:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—JANUARY 16, 2019 3 <br /> City Administrator Perrault explained if the County were to complete the water tower, the City <br /> would adjust the WAC accordingly on an annual basis. <br /> City Attorney Jamnik commented the City did not have to make a choice this evening regarding <br /> the water tower but could state their preference. <br /> Councilmember Holmes asked if the City was protected and that all fees would be covered by <br /> SAC and WAC charges. <br /> Ms. Kvilvang reported the preferred option would be Option 2, which would limit the City's risk. <br /> Mayor Grant commented on the fee schedule and asked if the fees could be adjusted by the JDA. <br /> City Attorney Jamnik advised the JDA would have their own fees and could not adjust the <br /> City's fee schedule. <br /> Councilmember Holmes believed that Exhibit F was problematic. She recommended the <br /> language regarding storm drainage and snow removal services be further clarified. <br /> Ms. Kvilvang commented some of the terms within the exhibits still need to be negotiated. <br /> Councilmember Holden questioned if a TIF district could be approved within TCAAP. <br /> Ms. Kvilvang reported this could be done. <br /> Councilmember Holmes asked if the TIF deadlines should be extended. <br /> City Attorney Jamnik recommended the Council not extend the TIF deadlines at this time. He <br /> commented this was a strategy matter that the Council should discuss further. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if the number included for planning recovery costs should be <br /> adjusted. <br /> City Attorney Jamnik advised the number remain as is for the time being and that additional <br /> costs be added in the future. He explained the AUAR would have to be updated after five years <br /> and these expenses would have to be rolled into the development costs. <br /> Councilmember Holmes stated the language within the cooperative agreement should perhaps <br /> read: the current amount. <br /> City Attorney Jamnik commented this could be done but anticipated this would lead to rounds <br /> and rounds of negotiations with the County. <br /> Councilmember Holden requested clarification on the assessment language. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.