Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JULY 22, 2019 14 <br /> <br />Ms. Peterson stated she looked up the apartment sizes for Presbyterian Homes noting their studio <br />units were 451 to 486 square feet. She indicated the Presbyterian Homes units had the exact same <br />layout as her proposed units, which were coming in at 436 square feet. She then commented on <br />the statutory requirements for memory care units, noting these studio apartments would be 380 to <br />450 square feet. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden questioned if the 436 square foot studio apartments would be market <br />rate. <br /> <br />Ms. Peterson commented these units were considered market rate and would be $1,600 to $1,800 <br />per month, which included all utilities and amenities. <br /> <br />Jamison Kohout, Summit Development, discussed the tree preservation that was planned for the <br />site. <br /> <br />Joe Radach, Engineer with Carlson McCane, commented on the amount of water that was <br />running into the stormwater pond from the Summit Development. He estimated the split would <br />be 50/50 between Summit and public property. He explained the fire lane had been designed to <br />handle the weight and size of the City’s fire trucks. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes asked who would be responsible for maintaining the trails. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported the applicant would be <br />responsible for maintaining the trails into the foreseeable future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes questioned if the land swap was for the tiny sliver or the whole park. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained this would be for the entire <br />park. Further discussion ensued regarding the proposed land swap noting a total rededication <br />would have to occur because the boundary lines were changing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the City would clean the pond and assess back the expense to <br />the applicant if the applicant were to default on the property. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported this was the case and noted <br />such language would be written into the developer’s agreement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden indicated she supported this plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated she too supported the plan but noted she had concerns pertaining <br />to the land swap and stormwater pond. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung agreed with Councilmembers Holden and Councilmember Holmes. <br />He explained he originally had concerns with the Pulte project and believed the applicant’s plan <br />was a better fit for the site and the City was receiving improvements to the park land from the <br />development. He was of the opinion this request would set a precedent. <br />