My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-19-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
08-26-19-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2019 4:01:30 PM
Creation date
8/22/2019 3:59:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – JULY 22, 2019 14 <br /> <br />Ms. Peterson stated she looked up the apartment sizes for Presbyterian Homes noting their studio <br />units were 451 to 486 square feet. She indicated the Presbyterian Homes units had the exact same <br />layout as her proposed units, which were coming in at 436 square feet. She then commented on <br />the statutory requirements for memory care units, noting these studio apartments would be 380 to <br />450 square feet. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden questioned if the 436 square foot studio apartments would be market <br />rate. <br /> <br />Ms. Peterson commented these units were considered market rate and would be $1,600 to $1,800 <br />per month, which included all utilities and amenities. <br /> <br />Jamison Kohout, Summit Development, discussed the tree preservation that was planned for the <br />site. <br /> <br />Joe Radach, Engineer with Carlson McCane, commented on the amount of water that was <br />running into the stormwater pond from the Summit Development. He estimated the split would <br />be 50/50 between Summit and public property. He explained the fire lane had been designed to <br />handle the weight and size of the City’s fire trucks. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes asked who would be responsible for maintaining the trails. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported the applicant would be <br />responsible for maintaining the trails into the foreseeable future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes questioned if the land swap was for the tiny sliver or the whole park. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained this would be for the entire <br />park. Further discussion ensued regarding the proposed land swap noting a total rededication <br />would have to occur because the boundary lines were changing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if the City would clean the pond and assess back the expense to <br />the applicant if the applicant were to default on the property. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported this was the case and noted <br />such language would be written into the developer’s agreement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden indicated she supported this plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated she too supported the plan but noted she had concerns pertaining <br />to the land swap and stormwater pond. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung agreed with Councilmembers Holden and Councilmember Holmes. <br />He explained he originally had concerns with the Pulte project and believed the applicant’s plan <br />was a better fit for the site and the City was receiving improvements to the park land from the <br />development. He was of the opinion this request would set a precedent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.