Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — OCTOBER 28, 2019 4 <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained the existing driveway <br />facing New Brighton Boulevard was built in 2000 and predates the current zoning code <br />restrictions for driveways in R-2 properties. The proposed detached garage on the subject property <br />is setback twenty-seven (27) feet from the property line and would encroach 13 feet into the front <br />setback. However, staff inspected other nearby R-2 properties and noted that numerous properties <br />in the same district have garages located within the front yard setback. The proposed garage <br />would be constructed to preserve an existing significant tree and would avoid which would avoid <br />relocating the power line to build the garage 40 feet behind the setback. The proposed garage <br />would otherwise meet all other R-2 zoning requirements. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reviewed the Plan Evaluation, <br />Variance Requirements and offered the following Findings of Fact: <br />General Findings: <br />1. The property at 1932 County Road E is located in the R-2 Single Family Residential <br />Zoning District. <br />2. The existing driveway on the property facing New Brighton Avenue is legally <br />nonconforming because it was built prior to the ordinance amendment pertaining to <br />driveways. <br />3. The property owners have requested a variance in order to construct a garage on the <br />driveway that would encroach on the front yard setback facing New Brighton Avenue. <br />4. The proposed garage would meet all other minimum setback requirements for the R-2 <br />District. <br />5. The proposed garage would meet the minimum lot coverage requirements, maximum <br />building height requirement for the R-2 District, as indicated by the plans submitted by the <br />Applicant. <br />6. The proposed development would not encroach on any flood plains, wetlands, or <br />easements. <br />7. The proposed development is not expected to impact any significant trees on the property. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained the Planning Commission <br />recommended approval by a 7-0 vote of Planning Case 19-013 for a Variance at 1932 Count Road <br />E W, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the October 9, 2019 Report to the <br />Planning Commission, as amended by the following conditions: <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the <br />conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City <br />Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. <br />2. A Building Permit shall be required prior to commencement of construction. <br />3. The structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. <br />4. The finish of the proposed addition shall complement the existing structure. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla commented the Planning <br />Commission noted concerns about the number of vehicles that could potentially be parked on this <br />lot with the two driveways. However, the Planning Commission did not formally add any <br />conditions of approval related to parking on site and instead recommended that the City Council <br />provide direction on this issue as part of this variance request. <br />