My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-06-20 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2020
>
05-06-20 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2020 1:35:00 PM
Creation date
7/1/2020 1:34:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 6, 2020 4 <br /> <br />requesting even more space than was previously approved on a 9,400 square foot lot. He stated <br />the Applicants were proposing to increase the FAR from .36 to .4. He explained the new plan <br />includes some questionable data. He reviewed the lot area numbers further and expressed <br />concerns that the facts were a moving target. He questioned why the City would assign an FAR <br />calculation to this lot that does not meet the square footage minimums of the zoning <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann referenced the packet from November and noted a different <br />architect had provided the City with those FAR numbers. He noted the size of the lot was <br />estimated to be 9,400 square feet. He reported the current Applicant has gone with a different <br />architect and a certified survey of the lot was provided to the City stating the lot was 9,900 square <br />feet in size. He reported this number was more accurate than the previous information taken from <br />an aerial photo. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth stated it was important for the City to have a clear lot size in order to <br />have this number as the denominat or for the FAR equation. He feared that at this time the City <br />had three or four numbers out there. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann clarified the correct and most accurate number was 9,900 square <br />feet based on the certified survey. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the change in the plans. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth expressed concern with the fact revised, detailed plans had not been <br />provided to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson commented a simple plan diagram had been provided to staff detailing the locations <br />of the two spots where additional space would be used if the FAR variance were approved. He <br />explained elevations had been provided to staff. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth stated it was concerning that this information was not provided to the <br />Commission. He reported the Commission was running blind and had no actual revised drawings <br />to review. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla apologized for not having this <br />information in the presentation. He noted he just received the information from the architect via <br />email this afternoon. He stated the diagram shows the additional FAR was in the basement and <br />above the garage. He explained if the FAR variance was not approved by the Commission these <br />spaces would remain storage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth asked if the change was to move the rehabilitation space to above the <br />garage. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported the plans before the <br />Commission were different from the previous plans. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lambeth questioned if there was any finished area adjacent to the garage in the <br />lowest level.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.