My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-06-20 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2020
>
05-06-20 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2020 1:35:00 PM
Creation date
7/1/2020 1:34:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – May 6, 2020 5 <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson explained there was a very small amount of finished square footage on the entry <br />level which would act as an entry/mudroom and houses stairs to go up to the main level, along <br />with a mechanical room. <br /> <br />Commissioner Vijums asked how basements that don’t meet minimum ceiling height was <br />considered within the FAR requirements. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Hartmann discussed the Minnesota State Building Code Requirements. He <br />reported the minimum was seven feet. <br /> <br />Commissioner Vijums questioned if the crawl space was less than seven feet. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated according to the applicant this <br />was correct. <br /> <br />Commissioner Vijums inquired where the therapy room would be located. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson indicated the occupational therapy room would be located either above the garage <br />or in the lower level. He stated his clients have yet to make this decision. It was noted the <br />exterior of the building would not change if this space were used for occupational therapy. <br /> <br />Chair Gehrig reported this Planning Case does not require a Public Hearing. However, he <br />opened the meeting for public comments. <br /> <br />Steven Campbell, 3248 Sandeen Road, stated he lives adjacent to the property in question. He <br />noted he submitted a letter on behalf of the residents in the neighborhood that have concerns <br />about the property. He explained he attended the previous Planning Commission meetings. He <br />indicated this was a unique lot that was non-conforming. He stated he had concerns with how the <br />FAR was being calculated. He expressed concern with the fact he has not been given information <br />from the City when it has been requested. He reported the proposed home was much too large for <br />the size of the property and he recommended the Planning Commission deny the variance request. <br /> <br />Jim Day, 3242 Sandeen Road, stated he lived south of the property in question. He discussed <br />State Code and reported in order for basement space to not be counted as livable it had to be <br />under six feet in height. He believed the square footage on the proposed home was too high. He <br />was of the opinion a variance was not justified simply because the applicant had not changed the <br />envelope of the home. He indicated the proposed home would be three stories from the street and <br />reported all other homes on Sandeen Road were one or two stories. He stated the proposed <br />home would be inconsistent with the character of the neighborhood. He recommended the <br />Planning Commission deny the variance request. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman stated he was listening to the meeting as an alternate. <br /> <br />Richard Priore, applicant, explained the house as presented meet all City Code requirements. He <br />indicated he could build this home tomorrow without needing a variance. However, because he <br />was requesting additional space for a therapy room, he needed to come before the Planning <br />Commission. He questioned why the neighbors were struggling with the additional space given
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.