06-22-2020-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—JUNE 22, 2020 17 12. Proposed extensions of water main and sanitary sewer constructed within Lot 1, Lot 2 and Outlot A shall be private utility services. Public utility easements will not be required over private water and sanitary sewer utilities within the site. The development agreement shall include private access easements over these utilities to the benefit of the three lots. 13. The Applicant shall add a 20-ft wide public drainage and utility easement to the plat extending along the north lot line for Lot 1, Block 1 and along the north lot line for Outlot A. 14. The Applicant shall add a 20-ft wide public drainage and utility easement to the plat extending along the south lot line for Lot 3, Block 1 between the east right-of-way line at the terminus of Dunlap Street and the southwest corner of Lot 1. 15. The Applicant shall add a 10-ft wide public drainage and utility easement to the plat extending along the north lot line for Lot 3, Block 1 between Outlot A and the west lot line for Lot 3. 16. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, all items identified in the May 27, 2020 Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. Councilmember Holden asked if Lot 1 had any frontage on Pine Tree Drive. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported this lot did not have frontage along Pine Tree Drive. He stated this meant this lot would have to have a private driveway. Councilmember Holden questioned who would be responsible for the private driveway. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated Bethel University would be responsible for the private driveway. Councilmember Holden inquired if Lot 1 would be responsible for paying repair costs for Pine Tree Drive. Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom indicated he would have to consult the assessment policy, but in a typical case, an assessment would be charged to those benefit from the repairs. He stated in general, this property would qualify as receiving a benefit and therefore would receive an assessment. Councilmember Holden asked why the parking lot was so big and questioned if there would be any parking lot sharing. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla indicated shared parking may occur but he did not have submitted plans for Lot 1 at this time. Councilmember Holden questioned if a park dedication fee would be charged for this subdivision. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported the final uses were unknown and therefore park dedication fees were not being charged at this time. He explained park