My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-08-09 FPAC Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Financial Planning and Analysis Committee (FPAC)
>
FPAC Packets
>
2009
>
09-08-09 FPAC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2024 4:19:12 PM
Creation date
8/19/2020 4:18:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
General Comments: <br />• It is important to remember that funds can be borrowed within the City from one <br />fund to cover a shortage in a second fund. These interfund borrowings can be <br />used to smooth out the collection of funds or to handle unusually large, <br />unanticipated fund requirements. <br />• Part of this process is to inform Capital Fund Balance Rationale. Fund Balances <br />held by the City are accumulated by the process collecting taxes or fees, or by <br />selling community assets (property or community franchise). As such these funds <br />are held in trust for the community to be used in benefit to the community. <br />Ideally all funds held will have a specific, planned purpose/use, but occasionally <br />funds will be held in anticipation of an undefined use. History (and depreciation <br />schedules) can help define the need for fund balances to replace broken or lost <br />city infrastructure. While the specific asset may not be clearly identified an <br />annual value can be planned for and held in a fund balance. Replacement of <br />depreciated assets can be budgeted for and accumulated in annual tax policy or <br />tax levies. Collection of funds to realize the creation of longer term community <br />assets can be collected for over a time that precedes the construction of the new <br />asset. <br />• The City's capital fund balance policy may be able to release for use funds (or <br />defer collection of) if a plan exists for how to replace or evaluate the use of capital <br />funds. <br />• Not all City or Community investments lend themselves to traditional business <br />measure of Return on Investment. Some New Creation of Community Assets <br />. may provide gradual improvement to the community `quality of life' whose value <br />will depend on the individual's personal values and interaction with the <br />Community Asset. <br />• Projects that utilize previously collected funds will place the project costs <br />predominantly on the current residents and businesses. Projects that utilize <br />outside grants, borrowed funds or deferral of future taxes will place the project <br />costs predominantly on the future residents and businesses. It is probably <br />appropriate to align the cost and benefits for individual projects so that those who <br />benefit predominantly carry the cost associated with the benefit. <br />Examples: <br />Creation of New Pedestrian Bridge: <br />• Cash Contribution — It would be appropriate to pay for planning and project <br />preparation costs out of existing City funds / budget. The understanding of the <br />community needs, the potential value added and project costs can be covered by <br />the City Departments. Since the benefit for this project will incur to future <br />residents, it is appropriate to consider outside fund sources or commitment of <br />future funds. <br />• Future Fund Sources — In this case there is evidence of a future regional and <br />community benefit. Appropriately placed pedestrian bridges allow for non - <br />motorized movement of people_ These people can be current residents, or future <br />residents / workers within the community. Outside funding sources can include, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.