Laserfiche WebLink
o Grants <br />o Contributions from Surrounding Residents /Businesses <br />o Assessment for Improvement District <br />o General Obligation Bonds <br />o TIF is not an option (State Exclusion) <br />• Project Valuation Assessment <br />o Criteria: <br />■ Numbers of residents impacted (residents on either side and <br />possible destinations) <br />■ Frequency of movements (survey of current pedestrian movements <br />on route) <br />■ Current Value of Businesses on proposed route benchmarked <br />against similar business on route with existing pedestrian access <br />■ Projected life of the community asset (depreciable life) <br />■ Potential for ancillary redevelopment along the proposed route <br />(e.g. percent of property with development greater than 30 years).\ <br />o Cost Pro -Forma <br />■ Comparison costs to other regional assets <br />■ Pro -Forma opportunity costs (is there a property value premium <br />for locations near to pedestrian bridges) <br />o Historical Experience <br />■ Accident report <br />■ Anecdotal complaints <br />• Community survey (business and residents) <br />■ Comparable experiences in other communities <br />Repair of a Damaged Park. <br />• Cash Contribution — It would be appropriate to pay for planning and project <br />preparation costs out of existing City funds / budget. The understanding of the <br />community needs, the potential value added and project costs can be covered by <br />the City Department Budgets. Since the benefit for this project is expected by <br />current residents and will also incur to future residents, it is appropriate to <br />consider using existing funds and/or to also seek commitment of future funds. <br />The damage to the existing park is impairment to a current community asset. <br />Delay or deferral of repair further damages the current community and will not <br />meet the community's expectation that taxes have been collected and paid to <br />maintain a park asset in a functional and undamaged state. <br />• Future Fund Sources — The project should not be expected to wait for the <br />collection of future sources of funds. However if fund balances are insufficient it <br />is not unacceptable to utilize General Obligation Bonds to allow the project to <br />proceed with payment made from future tax levies. <br />o TIF is not an option (State Exclusion) <br />• Project Valuation Assessment <br />o Criteria: <br />■ Numbers of residents impacted (residents on either side and <br />possible destinations) <br />