Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT B <br /> PROPOSAL RESULTS <br /> All seven consulting firms submitted quality proposals and are considered to be respected providers of civil <br /> engineering services in Minnesota. The result of the proposal evaluation process is summarized in the <br /> following table. <br /> Proposal Design Construction Total Proposed <br /> Firm Ranking Hours Hours Hours Fee <br /> Bolton&Menk 1 1625 1562 3187 $337,767 <br /> HR Green 2 1403 1199 2602 $330,373 <br /> WSB 3 903 1175 2078 $273,795 <br /> TKDA >3 2075 1218 3293 $346,833 <br /> Ulteig >3 1696 1294 2990 $390,156 <br /> Kimley Horn >3 1674 1006 2680 $336,770 <br /> SEH >3 1332 1251 2583 $270,270 <br /> EVALUATION CRITERIA <br /> ■ Project Understanding&Approach: The extent that the proposal sufficiently describes the process <br /> and results to be achieved and a detailed outline of how the firm will complete the project. <br /> ■ Team Qualifications: The extent that the firm has proposed team members with experience and <br /> capacity to complete all tasks within the project scope of work. <br /> ■ Experience: The extent that the firm and the proposed team has successfully completed similar <br /> projects involving municipal street and utility reconstruction projects. <br /> ■ Schedule: The extent that the proposal provides a clear and detailed schedule for completing the <br /> scope of work on the desired timeline and illustrates the sequence of tasks. <br /> ■ Cost: The extent that the proposal identifies sufficient hours to properly complete each task and <br /> the associated fee for each task. <br />