My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-2020-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
07-20-2020-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2020 9:31:08 AM
Creation date
9/17/2020 9:30:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JULY 20, 2020 13 <br /> <br />on how to manage, screen, or reuse the soil. They recommend the City enroll the project into the <br />MPCA’s Brownfield Program for eligible technical assistance and/or liability assurances related <br />to the PAH and DRO contamination present at the Project Corridor. A requirement of the <br />program would be to have an environmental professional onsite to oversee, screen, and document <br />all excavation and disturbances near known or suspected areas of contamination during <br />reconstruction. The road has been built up over the years and it’s assumed the road base was fill <br />that came from many unknown sources over time. Another scenario was that diesel or fuel oil was <br />sprayed on the road when it was gravel to reduce dust. Oftentimes coating that used to be used on <br />asphalt led to a problem. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked about control of contaminants, or paving over the areas. <br /> <br />Mr. Spenser said the plan they are recommending be prepared would document the materials that <br />can be reused under impervious pavement. Soils at three of the locations that were contaminated <br />would not be able to be reused as road base. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked if they did only reclamation but not reconstruction, would <br />reclamation disturb the soil, and how much it would cost to make a plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Spenser said reclamation would not get below the road base so impact would be minimized. <br />A utility replacement would have much more disturbance. The Response Action Plan document <br />would cost around $5,000 and the MPCA charges $125 for review. <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom said they are evaluating the need to replace <br />utilities south of Lindey’s. They are rather firm on the opinion there needs to be utility <br />replacement near the intersection at County Road E, but WSB didn’t identify contamination near <br />this intersection. <br /> <br />Mr. Spenser noted that contamination was as shallow as two to four feet below grade and as deep <br />as eight to 10 feet. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden felt they had to do the Response Action Plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Spenser said now that they know there is contamination, avoiding excavation is advised. <br />They could do directional boring or other plans to not open up a large contamination area. <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom mentioned they are evaluating the watermain <br />along the Snelling Avenue Corridor. The challenge comes in if the City adds a trail along the <br />roadway, it would involve much more handling of the contaminated material. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott would like option 3 as outlined in the agenda memo. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung said he was undecided between option 2 or 3. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes said between 2 or 3. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.