Laserfiche WebLink
Development of the Risk and Resilience Assessment <br />Arden Hills, MN <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 1 <br /> <br />KEY PERSONNEL AND BACKGROUND <br />Christopher Harrington, PE I Project Manager & Associate <br /> <br />EXPERENCE <br />16 Years <br /> <br />EDUCATION <br />MS, Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities – 2009 <br />BCE, Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities - 1998 <br /> <br />REGISTRATION/LICENSE <br />Professional Engineer, MN, 49831 <br /> <br />Chris’ 16 years of experience in civil & environmental engineering consist of working in municipal drinking water <br />services, international development of drinking water systems, wastewater treatment research, civil engineering <br />consulting, and education regarding civil engineering design, water system operation and maintenance, and public <br />health. Chris has served as a technical lead and project manager during planning, design, construction, and <br />troubleshooting of more than a dozen potable water, wastewater and stormwater pump station projects for pressure <br />boosting, wastewater conveyance, flood protection, stream augmentation, irrigation & combined sewer separation. <br />Chris has also presented his projects at CSWEA, MWOA, and AWWA events and has previously served as state <br />section chair for CSWEA. <br /> <br />SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE <br /> <br />Potable Water & Wastewater SCADA Improvements Design & Construction - City of Arden Hills, MN <br />Pursuit Leader, Project Manager <br />For this project we designed improvements to the City’s utility monitoring and control (SCADA) system. The goals for <br />the project were: (1) to provide Arden Hills with a single monitoring system, for both water and wastewater, <br />possessing technology for both current replacement and future expansion , and (2) to improve the reliability and speed <br />of communication between the water tower and the booster station. We evaluated cellular and radio technologies for <br />communicating between the tower and booster station and settled on dedicated spread spectrum radio telemetry to <br />monitor and report water level, power failure, and intrusion at their water tower. We recommended radio telemetry <br />due to its higher reliability and speed compared to cellular systems. To complete the design we wrote a request for <br />proposals which the City used to use to hire the services of a systems integrator to complete the installation. <br /> <br />Booster Pump Transient Analysis Risk Analysis - St. Paul Regional Water Services - St. Paul, MN <br />Pursuit Leader, Project Manager <br />For this project we evaluated the efficacy of a detail that SPRWS requires developers to follow wh en they install <br />booster stations for their development projects. We performed a hydraulic transient analysis that identified the <br />primary causes of added risk of hydraulic transients which included surge tank size, surge tank location, system flow <br />rate, total dynamic head of the system, and the size of the City main feeding the development. Based on our <br />assessment we recommended that SPRWS update the detail to include a surge tank on both sides of booster stations <br />since that arrangement provided the lowest risk to the City piping as well as the piping in the development. We also <br />identified that the current rule of thumb for sizing the surge tanks provides a significant factor of safety to protect <br />against low pressures on both sides of the station. <br /> <br />Water Hammer & Corrosion Risk Assessment - Western Lake Superior Sanitary District, MN <br />Pursuit Leader, Project Manager <br />For this project we assessed the interrelated risks of corrosion and hydraulic transients in three of the larger ductile <br />iron force mains in the state of Minnesota. We performed high-speed transient pressure monitoring, hydraulic <br />transient modeling, as well a corrosion risk assessment based on the identifiable causes of corrosion in force <br />mains. We performed our analysis and assessment on the Scanlon Force Main (4.6 miles of 30” and 42” DIP and <br />FRP), Knowlton Creek Force Main (4.9 miles of 48” and 54” DIP), and the Carlton Force Main (2.2 miles of 14” DIP). <br />We provided recommended improvements for all three pipelines to minimize the risk to their infrastructure.