Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 14 <br /> <br />Mr. Salzer explained the metal panels were manufactured by Alucobond and would have a high <br />end finish. He indicated the panels would be mechanically fastened by concealed fasteners. He <br />noted these panels were relatively common on office/warehouse buildings. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant commented he could envision the brick and EIFS but stated he was having a hard <br />time envisioning the metal panels. He reported the design of this building needed to be very <br />presentable given the fact it fronted both 35W and 694. He indicated he didn’t know if he could <br />vote for this project because he was uncertain what the City was getting. He stated typically the <br />City requires glass, brick and stone. He wondered why the developer did not go with tip up panels <br />that had exposed stone. He questioned if the City had any buildings in close proximity that had <br />these metal panels. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained the new additions at the <br />Mounds View High School and Land O’Lakes both had metal panels. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott stated the Applicant had developed the proposed building design in order <br />to compliment the surrounding buildings. He indicated he was not certain why the Council was <br />hung up on this issue. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant explained if he had examples of metal panels in the Gateway Business District than <br />he would be a believer in this building material. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated the City Council spent months creating the Round Lake Road <br />design standards. She reported this was an important property because it was visible from 694 <br />and 35W. She wanted this property to look nice. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung commented one of the things about Arden Hills was that the City <br />always wanted higher quality buildings than what some other communities would allow. He <br />indicated this was a major visual focus of one of the larger interchanges in the Twin Cities. He <br />explained this building exterior should be such that it provides a good viewpoint from either of <br />the two freeways. He stated he was concerned with the requested flexibility in terms of aesthetics. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes commented exterior flexibility has been requested, but noted the <br />specifics of the exterior flexibility was not quantified. She agreed this corner of the City should <br />look nice. She requested further information from staff regarding the aesthetic flexibility request. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla explained the metal panels required <br />the aesthetic flexibility request. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes asked if staff had pictures of the Applicant’s Brooklyn Park building, so <br />the metal panels could be viewed. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reviewed the pictures he had of the <br />Applicants Brooklyn Park building. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden questioned what the life expectancy was for the metal panels. <br />