Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 15 <br /> <br />Mr. Salzer indicated the metal panels came with a 20 year warranty. He reiterated that these were <br />very high quality, high end finish panels that were commonly used in building construction. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott stated if these metal panels were good enough for Land O’Lakes to place <br />on their headquarters, he did not believe it was necessary for the Council to debate this issue <br />further. He supported the metal panels being used on the proposed industrial building. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden indicated she did not oppose metal panels, but she wanted to be assured <br />that the metal panels that were used were high quality, like the panels used by Land O’Lakes. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant stated he wanted to see the building material and noted he was not comfortable <br />with the building exterior yet. <br /> <br />Mr. Salzer explained he had submitted to staff samples of the proposed building materials. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla clarified the City had not received <br />the building samples to date. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden questioned where the Council was in this process and questioned if <br />action on this item should be tabled. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant reported the Council was not up against a time clock for this Planning Case. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated this was correct. He noted for <br />the record there was an industrial building on Red Fox Road that used a similar metal panel. He <br />explained these buildings were completed by Roberts Management. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant indicated this building was on a gateway property that would be visible from 35W <br />and 694. He stated he was not comfortable approving this request this evening. However, given <br />the chance to review the building materials in further detail, he may be able to support the request. <br />He commented he would be more comfortable with precast stone versus the proposed metal <br />panels. <br /> <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla indicated the PUD would require a 4- <br />1 majority vote. <br /> <br />Mr. Salzer stated if the concern was with the metal panel, he would be happy to switch this out <br />with exposed aggregate within a precast panel. He noted, for the record, the metal panels were a <br />far superior product. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant commented the Council was living in a COVID world right now and he was not <br />comfortable with the proposed plans. He questioned how the Council wanted to proceed with this <br />project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes indicated the Applicant has stated the metal panel was a better product <br />than the aggregate stone. <br />