Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – OCTOBER 19, 2020 4 <br /> <br />There doesn’t appear to be much room to increase fees as you will lose participation. You need to <br />find the sweet spot where you charge enough to maximize revenue but not too much where you <br />scare off participation. The committee wants to see the user charges kept at a high enough level <br />that meets with the approval of the majority of users and utilize grants and scholarships through <br />the Arden Hills Foundation to assist with costs for those that can’t afford to participate. <br /> <br />Finance Director Bauman stated the Net Cost line from Attachment A represents the amount of <br />taxpayer dollars being utilized toward recreation programs. It ranges from $96,607 to $184,550 <br />for the years 2009 to 2019. The current 2021 estimate is $145,550. The cost factor having the <br />biggest impact on this number is full time employee wages that can vary from year to year. <br /> <br />Finance Director Bauman said items for the City Council to consider include: <br />• Is the range of 95% - 105% an acceptable level of coverage of direct costs by program <br />revenues? <br />• Do you want to look at coordinating with other cities for any of our adult programs? <br />• What programs do you want to make available and what user charges will the market support <br />to run them? <br />• Is there an amount of taxpayer dollars the council is comfortable with for allocating toward <br />recreation programs? <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden wondered what categories go into the 55% for Parks for the Program <br />Coordinator. <br /> <br />Finance Director Bauman explained how she split up the percentages. She also said Recreation <br />is all the programs that are done through the Rec program brochure; the programs offered, revenue <br />collected, supplies purchased and other charges directly related to those programs. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes felt staff did a nice job of summarizing what the FPAC came up with. <br />The committee felt the direct cost of the programs should be covered by the direct expenses so as <br />to break even and staff salaries are overhead and not covered. Program costs to residents have to <br />be competitive but staff costs wouldn’t be able to be covered with that revenue. She felt they need <br />to decide if they want to devote two full time people and their expenses to the Park and Rec <br />program. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden thought maybe they should have one full-time year-round and add one <br />part-time person in the summer. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said they could also have a full time and part time person year-round. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault suggested this could be something the Personnel Committee could <br />discuss and bring back to Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes said she’d like to hear Public Works Director/City Engineer <br />Blomstrom’s thoughts as the supervisor of the department. <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Blomstrom stated historically staffing has been between <br />1.25 to 2 FTEs. He characterized the recreation program as generally needing two full-time <br />employees at certain times during the year, such as managing spring and summer programs. One