My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-23-2020-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
11-23-2020-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2020 5:10:32 PM
Creation date
11/19/2020 5:09:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – OCTOBER 19, 2020 5 <br /> <br />full-time employee could potentially manage the recreation program during the winter season. <br />Projecting demand for future programs is also difficult as there have been changes in recreation <br />over the last ten years. For example, softball has declined in some communities and held steady <br />in others. Arden Hills staff, along with other communities, are trying to forecast how much <br />recreation demand there will be in the future. <br /> <br />Finance Director Bauman explained that anytime Public Works staff was working in the parks it <br />was coded to Parks Maintenance, not Recreation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden thought they should possibly look at this again in the spring because of <br />the uncertainty of COVID-19. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung felt he wasn’t sure they can come up with an answer now because of <br />unknow variables. He thought it was probably not the best thing to have a full two FTEs in this <br />area but he wasn’t sure what the right mix is. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes said they have always struggled with whether they need two people. <br />Regardless of what happens with COVID they probably need two people in the summer but not in <br />the winter. She felt there are other issues that could be looked at prior to the ending of COVID. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant agreed in general with the comments and the idea of putting it back to the <br />Personnel Committee to look at. He asked if the 95-105% range recommended for FPAC was an <br />acceptable level of coverage of direct costs by program revenue. <br /> <br />After further discussion, Council agreed that 95-105% was acceptable. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked if they wanted to look at coordinating with other cities for any of the adult <br />programs. <br /> <br />Council agreed they would like to continue coordinating with other cities. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant directed staff to add Parks and Recreation staffing to the January or February <br />Personnel Committee meeting. <br /> <br />D. Purchasing Policy Update <br /> <br /> Finance Director Bauman stated the City’s Purchasing Policy was last updated in 2014. <br />Updates are needed because Minnesota Statute contract limits have increased and are also <br />requiring local governments to have a policy on electronic funds transfers. Also needed is <br />information related to Cooperative Purchasing and Environmental Purchasing. An original draft <br />of the policy was distributed to FPAC members earlier this year for any comments they might <br />have on the proposed changes. The committee members didn’t have much experience with this <br />type of policy but felt it was more comprehensive and flowed better than the current policy in <br />place. A comment was made regarding the spending limits on page 3. FPAC felt the limits were <br />a little low. Staff concurs with this assessment and would recommend increasing the $7,500 <br />amount throughout the policy to $10,000 and replacing the tables on pages 3 and 11 highlighted in <br />yellow, with the new tables written in red. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.