My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-25-21-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
01-25-21-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2021 10:36:21 AM
Creation date
2/23/2021 10:35:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — JANUARY 25, 2021 10 <br />Mayor Grant commented cottonwood trees were not deemed significant by the City. <br />Councilmember Holden questioned what trees were on the significant tree list. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported the City deemed soft wood <br />trees that were 12 inches in diameter such as cottonwoods, poplar, aspen, boxelder, willow, silver <br />maple, and elm to be significant trees. <br />Councilmember Holden inquired if Planning Case 20-021 was a standalone document. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported this was a standalone <br />document and was separate from this Planning Case. <br />Mayor Grant questioned what the motion on the floor was at this time. <br />City Administrator Perrault clarified the motion on the floor was for the Ordinance amendment <br />to Chapter 13. <br />Mayor Grant asked if the Ordinance amendment required a 3/5 or 4/5 vote from the City <br />Council. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported Zoning Code Amendments <br />require a 3/5 vote from the City Council. <br />Mayor Grant recommended motions be separated on the agenda in the future that require <br />different votes. <br />Councilmember Holmes explained she had a problem with the language within the Ordinance. <br />She suggested the memory care units be referred to as memory care dwelling units. She reported <br />she supported the intent of the Ordinance, but believed it needed to be more carefully drafted. She <br />requested the grammatical language be cleaned up. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported Attachment B has the <br />updated and correct Ordinance document. <br />Councilmember Holmes thanked staff for the clarification. She stated she would be able to <br />support the approval of this document. <br />Councilmember McClung questioned when the Council should address their concerns regarding <br />the trees. <br />Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated this would be addressed under <br />the approval of the PUD and Site Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.