01-25-21-R - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — JANUARY 25, 2021 9 Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla estimated that at least 25 stalls would be provided. Councilmember McClung recommended the cross access agreement with Bethel University provide a minimum of 25 stalls. He commented further on the concerns he has regarding the tree loss and questioned how the City came up with the $20,000 payment amount. He supported the developer provide a cash payment in the full amount of the deficiency. He suggested the developer review the plans again to see if any additional trees can be added to the site. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla reported the applicant has been pointing out the number of trees on the site and have maximized the number of trees that can be planted on site. He stated additional trees were being planted along the access road. He explained the site could support more trees but then the health and wellness of the trees would come into question. He explained per City Code, the cash in lieu payment was supposed to cover the cost of materials, installation plus 10%. He requested the applicant address this question further. Florent Ilazi explained he had maximized the number and size of the trees on the site. He reported additional trees would be planted on Bethel Drive. He stated every square inch has been addressed for tree plantings. He reviewed the number of tree inches that would be replanted and commented a previous applicant was allowed to make a cash contribution to the City. For this reason, he was proposing to make a contribution in lieu of trees in the same amount as this previous applicant. He commented from a design standpoint, he has done all he could to work trees and landscaping onto the site. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated he understood the City liked to preserve trees. He commented on the Scannell Development project and noted a cash payment was made not for tree replacement but rather was made for caliper inch migration. He noted the Scannell developer donated $12,000 to the City because the site could not handle the minimum number of caliper inches required by City Code. He noted the Scannell site did not have any significant trees, while this site did have significant trees. Councilmember McClung commented on the previous case and explained the Scannell Development did not set a precedent. He understood the current applicant was asking for flexibility in other areas and therefore the City could ask for things as part of the PUD to make up for the flexibility. He did not believe the City was asking for too much, but rather was asking for a fee to be paid that equals the difference between what could be planted on site and what was missing. He questioned what this amount equated to. Community Development Manager/City Planner Mrosla stated he could not answer this question at this time. He turned this question over to the applicant. Florent Ilazi reported the $20,000 was below the amount it would cost to replace the caliper inches. He indicated he did not have an exact number, but understood it was higher than $20,000. He commented on the quality of the trees on the site, noting cottonwoods were not high quality. He stated he could work to determine a more accurate price with City staff. Councilmember Holden asked if cottonwood trees were significant trees.