My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-06-21 Planning Commission
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2021
>
01-06-21 Planning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2021 2:28:00 PM
Creation date
4/2/2021 2:26:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />____________________________________________________________________________________________ <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meeting for January 6th, 2021 <br />P:\Planning\Planning Cases\2020\20-022 New Perspectives Senior Living - CUP, PUD, SP, ZCA\PC Packets <br />Page 13 of 17 <br /> <br />I. Drainage and Flood Plain - Meets Requirements <br />The City Code requires stormwater management be provided to meet water quantity, infiltration, <br />and water quality requirements. The subject site has two existing wetlands. The existing wetland <br />located adjacent to Minnesota State Highway 51/Snelling Avenue North (Attachment H) is <br />proposed to be filled, however, replacement of that wetland has been mitigated offsite in <br />compliance with Rice Creek Watershed District regulations. The pre-existing stormwater pond <br />located on the east side of the subject site will be preserved. The Applicant is proposing a retention <br />basin located on the southwest side of the subject property. Prior to the issuance of a land <br />disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an operation and maintenance plan for the long- <br />term care of all onsite stormwater facilities. <br /> <br />J. Traffic Study - Meets Requirements <br />A traffic study was required and was completed by SRF. The proposed development should not <br />generate much additional traffic and is not expected to impact overall traffic operations within the <br />study area. The use does not add enough traffic to require any geometric or traffic control changes. <br />The anticipated trip generation during AM peak is 27 vehicles in and out of the site. The PM peak <br />is 36 vehicles in and out of the site. The site is anticipated to create 424 daily trips. <br /> <br />Suggested Findings of Fact <br /> <br />Staff offers the following findings of fact for consideration: <br /> <br />1. The Applicant submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use <br />Permit, Site Plan and Zoning Amendment. <br />2. The Subject Property is located within the B-2 General Business District and is guided as <br />CMU, Community Mixed Use on the Land Use Plan. <br />3. The Subject Property is located on approximately 6.40 acres and currently features open space <br />with a wooded area around the wetlands with a segment of the existing Anderson Center trail <br />system running through the site. <br />4. The Applicant is proposing to construct a 192,390 square foot, 4 story multi-family senior <br />living facility on site. <br />5. The proposed senior living facility will feature 146 units, with 113 units devoted to <br />independent or assisted living and 33 units devoted to memory care. <br />6. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: parking stall <br />count requirements, building height, permitted number of efficiency units and tree mitigation. <br />7. The proposed development plan meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City Code <br />in the following areas: building setbacks, landscape coverage, parking setbacks, planting <br />islands, tree selection, floor area ratio, drainage wetlands and flood plain tree selection, <br />lighting, screening and aesthetics. <br />8. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, flexibility has been requested by the <br />Applicant and/or conditions have been placed on an approval that would mitigate the <br />nonconformity. <br />9. A traffic study was required and was completed by SRF. The proposed development should <br />not generate much additional traffic and is not expected to impact overall traffic operations <br />within the study area. The use does not add enough traffic to require any geometric or traffic <br />control changes. <br />10. The application is not anticipated to create a negative impact on the immediate area or the <br />community as a whole.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.