My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-21-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
04-12-21-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2021 2:52:22 PM
Creation date
4/8/2021 2:45:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
402
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – MARCH 15, 2021 7 <br /> <br />watershed district. Boston Scientific works with multiple agencies to assure the health and safety <br />of employees and residents. <br /> <br />Ms. Thompson added that they have very strict handling procedures in place for lithium, from <br />delivery to manufacturing and waste. The safety processes will extend to the proposed addition. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott expressed concern about the handling of larger quantities of lithium in the <br />manufacturing process. <br /> <br />Mr. Hjel said safety measures are in place for managing, controlling and safely handling lithium. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden said she wasn’t concerned about anything happening with chemicals but <br />she would like to have the noise study explained more clearly. <br /> <br />Ms. Lancaster explained that VOC, hazardous pollutants, lead, and carbon monoxide, nitrogen <br />oxide and sulfur dioxide are all part of the permit they have to comply with. They are currently 30 <br />tons under the limit of 50 tons. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault said he had a conversation with a resident that pointed out a couple <br />of items and he said he would bring them forward. The concerns were: once the project is <br />complete how will they make sure the noise level is acceptable, is it correct that a follow up study <br />will be done? And there will be a point person identified for resident concerns? <br /> <br />Mr. Hjel replied both were correct. <br /> <br />Mr. Hjel responded to the second question on the resident letter regarding height and visual <br />pollution. The proposed plan has a penthouse to hold the HVAC system, and with that they <br />exceed the height limit by five feet. As per the Master Planned Unit Development Agreement <br />(PUD), they are granted the option to exceed the height, in this case it is partially to mitigate the <br />noise from the equipment and to have redundant building style. They are also planning to do <br />extensive restoration and landscaping. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said the PUD does give them the right to make requests, but the City can make <br />certain demands as well. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden clarified that the building is 35’ but if the penthouse with screening <br />brings it up to 40’ it is allowed. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant reminded Councilmembers they have a special meeting after the work session to <br />vote on the Boston Scientific JCF Resolution. He thanked Boston Scientific for their presentation <br />and addressing resident concerns, and requested when they determine the liaison person they let <br />staff know contact information. <br /> <br />C. 2022 PMP Arden Oaks Street Improvements Feasibility Report <br /> <br />Interim Public Works Director Swearingen said staff is preparing a resolution ordering a <br />feasibility study for the Arden Oaks Street Improvements for consideration by the City Council on
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.