Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Page 1 of 6 <br />PC Agenda Item – 3A <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: May 5, 2021 <br /> <br />TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners <br /> <br />FROM: Jane Kansier, AICP, Bolton & Menk <br /> Corrin Bemis, Bolton & Menk <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Planning Case #21-006 – No Public Hearing Required <br /> Applicant: Robert Kunze <br /> Property Location: 4073 Valentine Court <br /> Request: Variance <br /> <br />Requested Action <br /> <br />Robert Kunze (“Applicant”) has requested a variance to decrease the required side yard setback of <br />their single-family detached dwelling for a proposed garage addition located at 4073 Valentine <br />Court (“Subject Property”), ordinance requires a forty (40) foot side yard setback on corner lots. <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />1. Overview of Request <br /> <br />The Applicant is requesting a variance to decrease the required side yard setback of his single- <br />family detached dwelling on the Subject Property from 40 feet to 7.82 feet for a proposed garage <br />addition. The Subject Property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential District, and is guided as <br />Low Density Residential in the land use plan. Section 1320.06 of the Arden Hills City Code <br />requires a side yard setback of 40 feet on corner lots. <br /> <br />According to the Applicant’s narrative submitted as a part of his application, the Subject Property <br />includes unique circumstances due to its nontraditional shape. The front of the property includes <br />one curved section and three straight sections that make it difficult for the applicant to conform to <br />current setback regulations. The Subject Property is a legal non-conforming lot, as the required <br />side yard setback for corner lots was ten (10) feet when the property was built in 1953. The <br />Applicant is requesting the proposed garage addition to allow for more storage space for his <br />vehicles and additional space to store woodworking equipment. The proposed garage addition <br />would meet applicable building codes and all other regulations in the R-1 District. The applicant <br />would not be able to construct the proposed garage addition without a variance. <br />