My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-24-21-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
05-24-21-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2021 7:25:33 PM
Creation date
6/23/2021 7:25:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – MAY 24, 2021 16 <br /> <br />Mr. Lurk reported this was to accommodate the sidewalk that would run to the west. He reported <br />the stop sign could be moved five feet further to the south. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott stated he did not have enough knowledge to say one way or the other on <br />this. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes indicated she was confused. She noted there was not a stop sign at <br />Lexington Plaza. She believed people seemed to know to stop before coming out of a parking lot. <br />She commented if the intent was to stop traffic before the crosswalk, then the proposed location <br />would work. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier reviewed the site plan and noted the location of the proposed stop <br />sign at Red Fox Road. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated she was trying to have a stop sign at the parking lot exit at Red <br />Fox Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Lurk explained typically you wanted to stop traffic before they got to the crosswalk. He <br />indicated it was not typical to have two stop signs only 10 to 15 feet apart. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik reported when trails are separated by a boulevard back from the road right <br />of way, some cities have put a small sign up for trail crossing and a larger stop sign at the road <br />entrance. However, he deferred this matter to the City Engineer or County traffic safety <br />individuals. He suggested this condition be amended to require the applicant to verify with City <br />and County Engineers what signage approach would work at this intersection. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden withdrew her amendment to add Condition 27. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung withdrew his second. <br /> <br />AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember McClung <br />seconded a motion to add Condition 27 to read: The City Engineer and <br />the County Engineer will verify with the applicant what signage <br />approach should be installed at the intersection of Red Fox Road. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was taken. The amendment to add Condition 27 carried <br />(5-0). <br /> <br />A roll call vote was taken. The amended motion to approve Planning Case 21- <br />011 for a Master Plan Planned Unit Development (PUD) and a Final Planned <br />Unit Development at 3855 Lexington Avenue, based on the findings of fact <br />and submitted plans, the twenty (20) conditions as presented in in the May 24, <br />2021, Report to the City Council and the addition of Conditions 20, 21, 22, 23, <br />24, 25, 26 and 27 carried (5-0). <br /> <br /> B. Planning Case 21-005 – Ordinance 2021-003 Zoning Code Amendment – <br />Chapter 13, Section 1320, Subsection 1320.05 – Land Use Charter
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.