My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-21 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2021
>
06-09-21 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2021 7:53:09 AM
Creation date
8/5/2021 7:52:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – June 9, 2021 10 <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Ilazi explained the underground parking would be reserved for residents and the surface lots <br />would be utilized by tenants, visitors and employees. He discussed the parking need he has <br />found in his other senior living communities. He reported he has been working with Bethel <br />University in order to have 25 additional stalls for overflow parking. <br /> <br />Commissioner Subramanian questioned if 210 or 108 parking stalls was required. <br /> <br />Mr. Ilazi stated the tabled that was shown by staff described the City’s parking requirements. He <br />commented based on his need and the 20+ communities that he has built in the Midwest, he <br />shows a need for 108 parking stalls. He explained he was providing 95 parking stalls onsite and <br />had arranged with Bethel University to have an additional 25 parking stalls. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier commented on the parking need differences for multi-family <br />housing units versus senior living developments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Subramanian asked if a parking deficiency of 50% would be sufficient for this <br />property. <br /> <br />Alex Brewer, representative for the applicant, discussed how his team calculated the parking <br />need and stated he was leaning on his partner New Perspective. He stated New Perspective had <br />over 20 years of experience in this market with over 20 senior living developments in the <br />Midwest. He indicated parking was one of the first things that was discussed for new <br />developments, along with the amount of land that was required. <br /> <br />Commissioner Subramanian encouraged the applicant to consider the future needs of these <br />residents and not just the past needs. <br /> <br />Mr. Brewer stated he was basing the parking needs on the past and current needs of senior <br />residents. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber requested further information regarding the 25 parking stalls with Bethel <br />University. He asked if there was a specific set of 25 stalls being set aside for the senior living <br />development or would this be a random set of parking spaces. <br /> <br />Mr. Brewer reported he was working to identify 25 parking spaces that were available for the <br />cross access agreement. He commented major holidays were the main times parking was a <br />concern. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones supported the proposed shared parking with Bethel University. He <br />anticipated the Bethel parking lot would be close to empty on major holidays. He thanked Mr. <br />Brewer for clarifying this matter and noted he would withdraw all of the concerns he had <br />regarding parking. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.