Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – June 9, 2021 9 <br /> <br />26. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, <br />shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain <br />all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. <br />27. The maximum number of units permitted onsite is 149 units. <br />28. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary <br />charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. <br />29. Prior to the issuance of a land disturbance permit, the Applicant shall submit an operation <br />and maintenance plan for the long-term care of all on-site and off-site stormwater, <br />sanitary sewer, and water main to the City for review and approval. The Applicant will be <br />responsible to carry out these operation and maintenance activities and to submit the <br />appropriate documentation to the City as specified. <br />30. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize wooden gates and be constructed on three sides <br />using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved <br />by the Planning Department. <br />31. This approval does not include signs. A separate sign permit is required for all proposed <br />signage. All signage shall meet the requirements of Sign District 4. <br />32. The Applicant shall provide a cross parking agreement with Bethel University for the City <br />Attorney to review and for the City Council’s approval prior to the approval of the <br />Developer Agreement. <br />33. In the event where noise from the loading and delivery area is audible from an adjacent <br />residential district, the activity shall terminate between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 <br />a.m. <br />34. The applicant shall construct the trail as shown on the site plan, shall allow unrestricted <br />public use and shall plow, maintain and upkeep the trail. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Kansier reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on <br />this matter: <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber asked if the applicant would be installing an elevator that goes from the <br />garage to the new chapel on the third level. <br /> <br />Florent Ilazi, representative for the applicant, reported there would be an elevator that goes from <br />the garage to the chapel area, and all floors in between. He reported the amenities that were <br />previously proposed have not been removed, but rather have been relocated within the footprint <br />of the building. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber stated he had concerns with the density originally and he was pleased to <br />learn there were other developments with significantly higher densities in other communities. He <br />thanked the applicant for clarifying that the amenities had not been lost. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jones commented his concern was with the lack of parking on the site.