My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-20-21-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
09-20-21-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2021 9:35:14 AM
Creation date
9/17/2021 9:34:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Name: David Swearingen <br />Date: September 15, 2021 <br />Page: 2 <br />x ‘Rural’ Roadway Section –One which does not have curb/gutter along the edge of the roadway <br />x ‘Urban’ Roadway Section –One which has curb/gutter along the edge of the roadway <br />x Minimum Design Standards for Rural Reconstruction Projects (8820.9920): <br />o Lane Width = 11-12’ <br />o Shoulder Width = 6’ <br />o Maximum in-slope within clear zone = 4:1 <br />o Clear Zone = 10’ (4’ beyond the 6’ shoulder) <br />o Minimum Design Speed = 40 mph <br />x Minimum Design Standards for Urban Reconstruction Projects (8820.9936 & 8820.9941): <br />o Lane Width = 10-11’ <br />o Curb Reaction = 1-2’ <br />o Clear Zone = 1.5’ <br />o On Road Bicycle Facilities = 14-16’ Wide Outside Lane or 5-6’ Bicycle Lane <br />x Shared Use Path Standards (8820.9995): <br />o Minimum Surface Width = 8’ <br />o Shoulder/Clear Zone = 2’on each side <br />o Maximum in-slope = 2:1 <br />During our meetings, we also received State Aid Office clarification/interpretation of additional design <br />criteria boundaries that are not explicitly laid out within the State Aid Rules. These include: <br />x The State Aid Office will allow for a half rural / half urban typical section. However, the office <br />does not allow for a half reconditioning / half reconstruction typical section. This implies that any <br />roadway which is half ‘reconstructed’, such as where curb is added for more than 20 percent of <br />the length, must meet reconstruction standards. <br />x There are a number of factors that the State Aid Office uses in determining the classification of <br />various pedestrian facilities as either a ‘walk’ or a ‘trail’. The factors include material (concrete <br />vs bituminous), width, other adjacent facilities such as bike lanes or shoulders, and resulting <br />anticipated types of users of the facility. If bicyclists are anticipated to be used on the facility as a <br />result of the section design, the State Aid office indicated they would consider the facility a trail. <br />However, if the users are primarily going to be pedestrians and other features are provided for <br />bicycle users in each direction (such as wide shoulders or bicycle lanes), the classification would <br />likely be a walk, regardless of width or material. Without additional features provided for bicycle <br />users, it would likely be classified as a trail. Additionally, facility widths equal to or greater than <br />8 feet are typically considered a trail and less than 8 feet are typically considered a walk. <br />Variances from State Aid Rules are determined on a quarterly basis by the Variance Advisory Committee <br />to allow for deviation from the minimum design standards. State Aid Staff would not immediately <br />indicate support for a variance for this corridor without vetting of available alternatives and defined <br />physical constraints which could not be overcome. The attached alternatives were developed to see <br />whether state aid rules could in fact be met and if so, the state aid office would not be supportive of a <br />variance. Last, State Aid representatives were clear that project costs are not a sufficient reason for a <br />variance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.