My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-03-21 PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2021
>
11-03-21 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2021 2:07:58 PM
Creation date
12/9/2021 2:07:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – November 3, 2021 4 <br /> <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber asked if the parking lot was adequately sized given the size of the <br />building. <br /> <br />City Planner Jagoe stated the parking lot will accommodate the entire capacity of the building. <br />She discussed the required number of stalls and noted the site would be properly parked. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums noted 362 parking spaces were required. He questioned why an additional 198 <br />spaces were being added. <br /> <br />City Planner Jagoe explained the City’s calculation for parking was based on the floor area of <br />the building. She reported the developer has a tenant that is going to necessitate additional <br />parking. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums requested further comment from the applicant regarding the proposed parking. <br /> <br />Dan Salzer, Scannell Properties, explained the 362 stalls was to meet the building square footage <br />requirements for the City. He commented now that he has tenants, there was a need for more <br />parking. He discussed how he was working to meet the needs of his tenant. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums questioned if the change to working from home, or working virtually would create <br />a shift in the parking needs for this property. <br /> <br />Mr. Salzer indicated his tenant has looked into this but based on the tenants other location, the <br />proposed parking would remain as is. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes stated she was confused with why the tenant would require such a <br />large number of parking spaces given the fact the chart shows a large portion of the building <br />would be warehouse. <br /> <br />Mr. Salzer discussed how the building would be divided between office, warehouse and lab <br />space. He stated the additional 198 parking spaces were based on the tenants needs. He noted he <br />could provide staff with an updated chart for the building space breakdown prior to the City <br />Council meeting. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums questioned if the additional 198 parking spaces were needed given the fact this <br />would come at a great cost and disrupts a wetland. <br /> <br />Mr. Salzer explained the site would have 40,000 square feet of office. He reported the tenant <br />would be bringing a lot more employees to the building than was anticipated in the spec building.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.