My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-10-22-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
01-10-22-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2022 3:56:38 PM
Creation date
1/6/2022 3:55:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION –December 8, 2021 3 <br />6. The City and School District staff concur on the proposed conditions and recommended <br />improvements. <br />Planning Consultant Kansier stated staff recommends approval of Planning Case 21-028 for an <br />Amended PUD at 1900 and 1901 Lake Valentine Road, based on the findings of fact, as <br />amended by the conditions in the December 8, 2021, Report to the Planning Commission: <br />a) The road construction and realignment as shown on the approved plans must be <br />completed prior to the start of the 2022-2023 school year. <br />b) All other conditions of the original Planned Unit Development and Amended Planned <br />Unit Development shall remain in full force and effect. <br />Planning Consultant Kansier reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on <br />this matter: <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted <br />3. Recommend Denial <br />4. Table <br />Chair Vijums opened the floor to Commissioner comments. <br />Commissioner Jefferys asked if these changes were due to the addition of the north lot. <br />Chair Vijums discussed how the school property had been renovated over the past few years, <br />noting they made more room for parking and was also working to improve pedestrian safety. <br />Mike Tierney, Bolton & Menk, representing the applicant, explained the school acquired the bus <br />garage property and was working to bring it into compliance. He reported the drop off at the front <br />entry has been working well. <br />Commissioner Jefferys questioned how the City calculated the number of parking spaces a <br />school needed. <br />Planning Consultant Kansier stated the required number of parking stalls was based on the <br />number of students and staff members. She explained there were approximately 1800 students <br />plus staff which led the City to recommend 622 spaces. She noted the additions were not <br />expected to increase enrollment but rather were to manage the students currently in the school. <br />Commissioner Wicklund asked if the applicant was supportive of Condition A. <br />Planning Consultant Kansier commented she believed the applicant supported this condition. <br />Commissioner Weber indicated he was not supportive of the colorized concept plan. He noted <br />this did not match with the submittals within the engineering plan. He stated he would prefer to <br />see a concept plan that resembles what would be done. He reviewed the overhead plan and <br />explained he did not see value in having cars from the west turn to go east out of the west exit. DRAFTonoer comments.ment <br />changes were due to thes were due to th <br />he school property had he school property <br />for parking and was alsoor parking and was al <br />& Menk, representing th& Menk, represen <br />was working to bring it was working to bring i <br />ing well. ing w <br />questionequestione
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.