My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-18-22-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
01-18-22-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2022 9:42:12 AM
Creation date
2/18/2022 9:41:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION - JANUARY 18, 2022 <br />B. MnDOT Highway Speed Signs <br />City Administrator Perrault stated that last year the city worked to get a speed sign installed on <br />southbound Highway 51 in the Snelling Avenue, Glenhill Road intersection area. During previous <br />discussions, Council requested looking at a northbound sign somewhere along Snelling. There is <br />an existing sign in inventory so the city would only be paying for installation costs of about <br />$2,700, and potential permit fees. The city received an email suggesting Council also consider a <br />speed sign on eastbound 96. Any work or installation permit on Highway 96 would have to go <br />through Ramsey County. <br />Mayor Grant noted that there were two fatalities at the intersection on the Old Snelling access to <br />Highway 96. When going eastbound on 96 to make the turn to southbound Old Snelling, the cars <br />sneak up on you deceptively fast, partially because they're coming uphill. <br />Councilmember Holden said she was thinking it should go on northbound Snelling. But because <br />the speed limit isn't being enforced between County Road E and 694, putting the sign there <br />doesn't seem worthwhile. Putting it on 96 might have some extra merit, compared to putting it on <br />Highway 51. <br />Councilmember Radziej stated that he would lean towards going north on Snelling but south of <br />County Road E, north of the Snelling connection, around Hamline or the city boundary. <br />Councilmember Holmes commented that she wanted to advocate for both locations. On Snelling <br />there are people merging off of County Road E and further up there are people merging from Red <br />Fox Road. She thought it should be closer to E. She sees people slowing down by the sign on Old <br />10. On Highway 96 were they talking about the intersection crossing the bridge to the stoplight? <br />Mayor Grant said he was thinking somewhere just east of the Holiday gas station, maybe about <br />halfway or a third of the way down. But there is only one sign available. <br />Councilmember Holmes said if there was only one, she would go with 96 because that was a <br />problem in the past. <br />Councilmember Scott stated that he didn't think northbound Snelling is a huge priority, there are <br />pretty good sight lines northbound. There are a couple of spots on Highway 96 that he would <br />prefer to have a sign, focused around Keithson. <br />Councilmember Holmes felt the Mayor's idea of having it by the Holiday gas station was a better <br />idea because of the left-hand turn. <br />Mayor Grant added that particular turn is the one students use to drive to the high school and <br />during periods of the day there is a pretty solid amount of left turn traffic. If we put a sign <br />somewhere between the Holiday and that turn, people will slow down and hopefully not pick their <br />speed back up as they go toward Keithson. <br />Councilmember Holmes said maybe our traffic engineer could study this before it comes to the <br />Council for approval. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.