My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-22-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
04-11-22-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2022 11:56:14 AM
Creation date
4/7/2022 11:55:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – MARCH 14, 2022 4 <br /> <br />declaring the cost to be assessed tonight which meant the amount could be lower but could not be <br />higher. <br /> <br />Councilmember Radziej discussed his understanding of how bonds and bid bonds worked in <br />further detail. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden expressed concern that the contractor could walk away from the project <br />and the City would then be stuck scrambling to find a contractor to finish the project and that the <br />assessments would then increase due to a new contractor with a new bid price. <br /> <br />Mr. Poppler stated once a contractor was locked into a bid bond, the contractor finished a project <br />to completion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden questioned what would happen if staff were to receive unfavorable <br />comments from the references for the low bidder. <br /> <br />Public Works Direct/City Engineer Swearingen stated the Council could reevaluate the bids at <br />that time and noted there was a $2,000 difference between the low bidder and the next lowest <br />bidder. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes believed that Councilmember Holden had brought up some good points <br />and she would like to know more about how the bonding works. In addition, given the volatility <br />of the oil market, perhaps the Council should have the City Attorney clarify the situation and <br />provide information on what would happen if the contractor were to back out. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden explained if this matter were to move forward, the Council would be <br />taking the low bid and while there is only a $2,000 difference for the Arden Oaks project, there <br />was a $20,000 difference for the Snelling Avenue project. She suggested the date for the <br />Assessment Hearing be set but that the Council hold a meeting prior to the work session to allow <br />for further discussion on the concerns that were raised. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked if the Council would be holding a short City Council meeting after the next <br />work session. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault reported this was the case. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott questioned how many bids the City received for this project. <br /> <br />Mr. Poppler reported the City received nine bids. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden inquired if the Council were to table this for one week if staff would <br />have enough time to investigate this matter further. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault believed staff would have enough time to get these answers for the <br />Council by next Monday. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.