My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-22-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
04-18-22-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2022 3:34:01 PM
Creation date
4/14/2022 3:30:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION – MAY 24, 2021 3 <br /> <br />City Clerk Hanson stated the City has garage sales and boutiques permits that are no fee permits. <br />She said there is also a miscellaneous permit application that provides for 5K races at no fee, <br />block parties at no fee (generally Night to Unite), sidewalk sales at $53, and solicitors/transient <br />merchants which also have an associated permit and background check fees. She said there are <br />various general rentals and then the actual business licenses that are more defined. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung stated he supports the proposal to regulate a commercial health food <br />service activity in terms of staff time. He indicated he supports a fee be assessed to recuperate the <br />costs of staff receiving information, answering questions, and so forth and noted the City is not <br />trying to raise money but rather recuperate staff costs. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant said that charging a fee would enable this function to not be overlooked and <br />recover staff time. <br /> <br />A short discussion ensued and the City Council agreed to implement a fee of $20 for a residential <br />food truck permit. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes asked about an administrative penalty for a resident not obtaining a <br />permit and suggested Council discuss a fee of $100. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked what the fee was for violations such as a peddler. <br /> <br />City Clerk Hanson deferred to City Attorney Joel Jamnik as this type of particular fee is not <br />called out currently in the Fee Schedule. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik stated that most misdemeanor violations are on a payables list and may be <br />reduced if it goes to court. He said that having a $100 administrative penalty could be consistent <br />with City Ordinance and other charges. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant asked if this fee is consistent with other cities that City Attorney Jamnik represents. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik said that most cities double or triple the initial permit fee but that many do <br />not have such a small initial fee for a permit of $20. <br /> <br />The City Council agreed to propose a $100 administrative fine. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung stated regarding conditions of licensing and condition, that he would <br />like better clarification and proposed taking the word “resident” out so there is no ambiguity as to <br />the definition of resident. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant agreed as he had attended a catered event in Shoreview, noting he was invited but <br />is not a resident of Shoreview. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik indicated that the intent of the use of the word resident was to indicate a <br />resident of the property where the truck will be located. He said the intent is to reference that food <br />may be provided to the owners of property and their guests but not to the members of the general <br />public.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.