My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-18-22-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
04-18-22-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2022 3:34:01 PM
Creation date
4/14/2022 3:30:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION – MAY 24, 2021 4 <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung stated he was fine with this but would like to better clarify the <br />language referring to resident. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik stated that the Council can clarify that the resident is the owner of the <br />property where the truck is located and their guests. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung stated the purpose of an amendment is to not have a resident say that <br />anyone they invite is a “guest” as it becomes a community event rather than a private catered <br />event. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik noted that a fairly broad net can be cast if the City were to try to classify <br />events and thus enforcement becomes difficult. He stated that rather the City could regulate the <br />events as far as the number of events allowed at a property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes also questioned the word “resident” and agreed that it is ambiguous. <br />She recommended that the permit indicate the type of event and thus not be a general invitation. <br />She said she would prefer to use the word guests as resident is too vague. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik reiterated that limiting the number of events is being proposed just for <br />residential properties and not commercial establishments. <br /> <br />Councilmember Scott asked for clarification about temporary versus annual licenses and the <br />duration of such. <br /> <br />City Administrator Perrault stated that the maximum of no more than 21 days applies to non- <br />residential properties of which can operate up to 21 days at the same location, but the food truck <br />can operate in other locations in the city throughout the year. He reiterated the 21 days for an <br />annual license refers to operation at one, single commercial location. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik concurred with the definition of the annual license as it pertains to <br />commercial properties and reiterated the difference between a temporary and annual license. He <br />said that under the proposed amendment, a residential property would be limited to two events at <br />a single residence. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes said yes, the food truck can operate at several residential properties as <br />long as it is not at the same residential property more than twice. <br /> <br />The City Council resumed discussion regarding locations and the reference to “residents” instead <br />of “guests”. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik said his preference would be to elaborate that residents means owners or <br />residents of the subject property and not a broader resident of the community or neighborhood. <br />He suggested adding language to indicate that “resident” is referring to the resident of the <br />property, the owners, the tenants or other occupants. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung suggested saying “sales or service may only be made to residents of <br />the property requesting the permit and guests at the catered event”.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.