My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-22-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
02-22-22-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2022 2:59:25 PM
Creation date
4/22/2022 2:56:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 8 of 14 <br /> <br />BUILDING HEIGHT <br />Based on Developer’s review and interpretation of City Zoning Code, the R4 Multiple Family District allows for <br />a maximum building of 35’. Which is based on the average height between eaves and the peak of a pitched <br />roof. The proposed building includes an approximate eave height of 32’, and an approximate highest roof <br />peak height of 44’. Developer believes a deviation to City Zoning Code for maximum building height will be <br />required. The exact requested building height request will be known upon submittal of a formal PUD <br />application. Developer currently estimates a deviation to 4'-8’ will be required. <br /> <br />NOTE: this site is also encumbered by the City’s Shoreland Overlay District. Said district requires a <br /> maximum building height of 35’. The Developer is unsure how this section of City Zoning Code <br /> defines height. If height in this section of code is to the roof eave—this proposed project is in <br /> compliance (32’ eave proposed by Developer). If height is defined as the roof peak and/or average <br /> roof peak then this project may not be in compliance. <br /> <br />NOTE: if providing flexibility to this requirement is not available to the Developer, alternative <br /> solutions to meet this requirement will be explored. Examples include utilizing a flat roof. The <br /> developer is proposing a pitched roof to better compliment the surrounding single family <br /> residential neighborhoods. <br /> <br /> <br />BUILDING SETBACKS <br />Based on Developer’s review and interpretation of City Zoning Code, the R4 Multiple Family District requires <br />the following minimum building setbacks: 40’ front yard, 30’ rear yard, 10’ side yard, 40’ side yard corner. <br />The proposed project includes building setbacks that well-exceed the City’s required minimums—please see <br />enclosed site plan for details. The Developer does not believe a deviation to City Zoning Code for minimum <br />building setbacks is required. <br /> <br /> NOTE: this site is also encumbered by the City’s Shoreland Overlay District. Said district requires a <br /> minimum building setback from streets and highways of 40’. It is the Developers interpretation that <br /> this proposed project complies with said section of City Zoning Code. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.