My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-16-22-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
05-16-22-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2022 9:36:51 AM
Creation date
5/16/2022 9:36:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM – 1E <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: May 16, 2022 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: City Hall Work Space Discussion <br /> <br />Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: <br />$0 $55,000 (est) Equipment/Building Fund <br /> For Council Consideration <br /> <br />The City Council should consider providing direction on a future layout for City Hall work spaces. <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The Personnel Committee discussed the current layout of City Hall and whether or not changes <br />need to be made, these changes would be to organize departments so employees within a <br />department are located closer together and to start to plan for future staffing needs. Currently, all of <br />the offices in City Hall are occupied, two cubicles on the second floor are open and two cubicles <br />are partially utilized by either temporary staff or a consultant. Attachment A provides a current <br />layout (note, the configuration of cubes may be slightly different than the rendering). Three <br />different options were discussed: 1. Moving a whole department upstairs (Public Works), 2. <br />Transforming the second floor into a “c-suite”, or 3. Making changes to the lobby and/or basement <br />and buildout staffing areas. Option 1 was generally agreed to as the favored choice. See below for a <br />brief explanation of each. <br /> <br />Option 1: Moving a department to the second floor (recommended option) <br />This option was considered to be the most cost efficient and logical if the intent is to put a whole <br />department together. The Personnel Committee discussed which department makes sense to move <br />upstairs, and took into consideration factors, such as, space needs, future staffing needs, and who <br />interacts with the public at the front desk most often. The department that interacts most with the <br />public, other than admin, is Community Development, this includes working with contractors that <br />come in for permits and residents asking questions about zoning. Finance is likely second due to <br />utility billing customers and questions. Public Works does work with customers, but to a lesser <br />extent, furthermore Public Works is often out in the field on job sites. It is also projected that <br />Public Works may need two to three additional staff in the future. This option would be broken <br />down into two phases, the first phase starting on the second floor. The second floor could <br />accommodate the additional employees. However, it would require changes to the current layout,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.