My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-06-22 PC Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2022
>
07-06-22 PC Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2022 1:31:36 PM
Creation date
6/30/2022 1:28:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 16 of 20 <br /> <br />leaving the car wash tunnel are exiting on the north side in a circular traffic pattern. It is stated <br />that the car wash will not have a towel dry service. As customers exit out on the northern end, <br />they are immediately wrapping around to the parking spaces to utilize the self-service vacuum <br />stalls that face the car wash. <br /> <br />City code states “electronic devices such as loudspeakers or devices, and similar instruments, shall <br />not be located within 50 feet of any adjacent lot regardless of use or zoning district.” In the <br />Applicant’s narrative, they’ve provided an illustration that shows the locations of the proposed <br />menu boards. For Panera, the electronic menu board is shown on the north side of the building. <br />Again, the multi-tenant building is setback 45 feet from the north property line. This need for <br />flexibility was discussed with the Applicant during the concept review. <br /> <br />The schematics for Rocket Car Wash include an illustration for the point of sale canopy and island <br />layout which is approximately 25 feet from the west property line. No additional information was <br />included in the submittal on amplification or display features of the automated pay stations for the <br />car wash. As noted above, the Applicant has reference to “smart signage” shown on the point of <br />sale island layout, but has stated that will not be part of this review. Planning Staff did request an <br />updated site plan and operational logistics (i.e. menu board, attendant, pay terminal, loud speakers, <br />etc.) for how the point of sale transactions will function for the car wash. That information was <br />not provided by the time of writing this report. Based on the site plans submitted, the Applicant <br />is seeking flexibility from the requirement for placement of electronic devices. <br /> <br />3. Traffic Study and Site Circulation <br />The site currently has four access points to the Subject Property. The access closest to Lexington <br />Avenue and the westerly access onto the adjacent property are being discounted entirely as part <br />of the proposal. The Applicant intends to utilize two accesses for the proposed development. <br />Access 1 will be located on the north side of Grey Fox Road, approximately 240 feet west of <br />Lexington Avenue, with one egress lanes and one ingress lane. Access 1 will be aligned with the <br />existing grocery access to the south to minimize conflict areas. Access 2 will also be located on <br />Grey Fox Road, approximately 360 feet west of Lexington Avenue, with one egress lane and one <br />ingress lane. A traffic study has been prepared (see Attachment J for summary section of report). <br /> <br />Lastly during the previous reviews, the Applicant was asked to demonstrate how semitrailer <br />traffic would maneuver around the Subject Property. The Applicant did not provide as part of <br />their submission a plan illustrating vehicle movements. The Public Works Director/City <br />Engineer has requested this information. Additional information will be necessary to evaluate <br />turning radius and may provide additional comment on site functionality once received. The <br />pedestrian routes were identified as part of the civil plan exhibits. <br /> <br />4. 1355.04 Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications <br />A public hearing for a CUP and PUD request is required before the request can be brought before <br />the City Council. The applicant or its representative shall be given the opportunity to appear before <br />the Planning Commission to answer questions or give explanations regarding the proposal. Upon <br />completion of the public hearing and its study and consideration of the application, the Planning <br />Commission shall submit its written report, containing its findings, conclusions, and <br />recommendations as to the application, to the City Council. <br /> <br />Plan Evaluation Summary <br /> <br />The table below provides the performance standards for the B-3 District and the preliminary <br />analysis for the proposed development:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.