My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-01-1998 PTRC Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1990-1998
>
1998
>
12-01-1998 PTRC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2024 12:26:16 AM
Creation date
7/12/2022 12:43:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• EXCELLENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26% � . <br /> GOOD 58% <br /> ONLY FAIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8% <br /> POOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1% <br /> DON'T KNOW/REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8% <br /> Only nine percent rated them lower. <br /> Favorable ratings were posted most often by frequent users of Park and Recreation offerings. <br /> Unfavorable rating were found among City Hall visitors and those with over $75,000 annual <br /> household income. Uncertainty was highest among those with no plans to leave the community, <br /> those with no City Hall Staff contact, non-visitors of City Hall, non-users of Park and Recreation <br /> offerings, empty-nesters, and over 55 year olds. <br /> Those posting an evaluation were asked a follow-up query: <br /> Why do yoti feel that way? <br /> Higher evaluations were generally based on the perception that "park and recreation facilities <br /> were clean and well maintained:" <br /> DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> • CLEAN-KEPT UP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61% <br /> FUN TO USE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17% <br /> COULD IMPROVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8% <br /> NEED MORE OF THEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4% <br /> GOOD AMOUNT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7% <br /> "Fun to use" was a secondary reason for favorable evaluations. <br /> "Clean-kept up" was key to those who don't work in Arden Hills, Precinct Four residents, <br /> marginally informed residents about the Mayor and City Council, non-visitors of City Hall, and <br /> empty-nesters. "Fun to use" was mention by workers in Arden Hills, and households with <br /> children. "Could improve" was cited most often by City Hall Staff customers. and City Hall <br /> visitors. "Good amount" was pointed to by workers in Arden Hills, and City Hall visitors. <br /> The Arden Hills Park and Recreation System ranked among the top in the Metropolitan Area <br /> suburbs. <br /> City-Sponsored <br /> Recreational <br /> . Opportunities <br /> Residents were asked: <br /> 42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.