My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-1982 PTRC Meeting Agenda
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
05-11-1982 PTRC Meeting Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2024 12:16:55 AM
Creation date
8/17/2022 3:36:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w <br /> 5 . McTavish . Needs have changed since the plan was adopted, <br /> a need for more fields has developed . This plan met basic needs <br /> at that time . it would be very poor park pianning at this time <br /> not to allow for eventual development of this field (not to follow <br /> the plan as SUbmitted to Council In February) and allow for the <br /> league size field when and if it is needed . <br /> 6 . P. Lippert. i am a member of the Parks Committee and a resl - <br /> dent of the Cummings Park area. At this time many of us can see <br /> a need for tot lot, smali size field, etc. In years to come, our <br /> chlicren will be teenagers and need facilities as included In this <br /> plan . Park should be planned for the greatest good of all , now <br /> and in the future . <br /> 7. A . Montgomery (Cummings Park area) . We are not saying no <br /> organized activities; envision youth soccer, softball , no adult <br /> organized leagues . <br /> 8 . Susan Anderson (Cummin ssPParrk area) . We have no assurance <br /> that If the area Is graded, if there is any pressure for another <br /> adult field, you won 't put it in . There will then be parking In <br /> the cul de sac, activities planned seem jammer together in too small <br /> an area. It seems like too many activities to put into a park <br /> with only CDC parking lot accessibility . <br /> (Parks Committee members pointed out that this plan had been devel - • <br /> oped by a professional planner with assurances that there is <br /> adequate space in the area: for these things planned. ) <br /> 9. D. Kostishack . Each. Arden Hills park beiangs to the entf ;,e <br /> community, should serve entire community . <br /> 10 . J . McTavish . Would l i ke to see the recommendations as ui4t de In <br /> February ' s Parks and Recreation Committee minutes stand. <br /> 1 1 . A. Montgomery (Curet ings Park area) . Parks Committee should <br /> make a concentrated eff►:►rt to fTrid more land while there Is ,.ti I l <br /> some land available; took at the Arsenal to see if some can be <br /> purchased there, gook a-` Round Lake area. <br /> 12 . Name not alven (Cummings Park area) . The plan we are proposing <br /> allows a good area for * nformal activities with not as much grading <br /> done . <br /> 13. Tom Leonard (Cummings Park area) . Has had experience with <br /> living by a park with scheduled activities, has five children, found <br /> their activities were scheduled as much In other parks as in the <br /> one bordering his home, so did not eliminate driving, Questioned <br /> Arden Hills park drinking ordinance; said he had scheduled two <br /> company games at Perry Fark two years ago and provided beer for <br /> all players . Stated th•,t if you are depending oit CDC parking lot, <br /> you ' re Just deluding yourselves, depending on oullside corporation • <br /> for parking Is poor planning. Feels Parks Depar-�ment Is trying to <br /> fit a "square peg" in a round hole, with this plan . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.