My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-1976 PTRC Meeting Minutes (2)
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1968-1979
>
1976
>
03-09-1976 PTRC Meeting Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2024 6:32:16 AM
Creation date
8/18/2022 3:04:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> M-.Lrlutes of Floral Park Neigbboriood MeefAng <br /> V-.1i-Ilase of Azden Hills <br /> Tuesday, March 9, 1976 <br /> Village Hall <br /> Present: Conmiittee members, Bob Ax.derson, Mary Blonquist, Maureen Cronin, <br /> Cheryl Grudnoske and Bob O'Toole. <br /> Uso Present: Councilmen Charles Crichton and William Feyereisen and Park <br /> Director, John Buckley. <br /> About 35 neighborhood residents atte-tided-nded this naeting. <br /> The meeting began. Fait? Robert 1,ijzdergon introducing John Buckley. Buckley <br /> pi-oceaded to explain the --hi3tory, basic philosophy and intent of the Arden <br /> Hills Park Committee and continued with the history of Floral Park. <br /> R. Anderson then presented the three concept plans for Floral Park, prepared <br /> I - <br /> by the University students. The meeting was then opened for questions and <br /> conments from the residents. <br /> Some concerne of the residents: <br /> - Provisions for policing park as development proceeds. <br /> • - Concerned about park access; wanted major access off Hamline to <br /> elim-inatt, tra1ftc from Floral Park neighborhood. <br /> - Opposed to large parking lots and roadway through park. <br /> - Concern that development would dectrcy marsh area in park. There <br /> was an expressed-desire to keep park as natural as possible. <br /> - %csiu-euca QU lau-idrl Vaks ilcai'l otiected to too rmuch develop,ment <br /> (ball fields, ten-ais courts) , adjacent to their southern property <br /> line. <br /> - Some residents were concerned gbOut P4V% boundries. Park property <br /> should be tool defined vith trees, shrub and other plantings. <br /> - Concern that future wa;,.king and bile paths would rest-alt in Alimiting <br /> privacy. <br /> Cormeqts on Park lmpro,7enment: <br /> - General consensus was that thc development should be low key and <br /> gradual. <br /> - Desire for sUitin-g,, and hockey facilities. <br /> - Informal ball field wau desirable. <br /> - Park develop went be planned for the interior of the park to protect <br /> residential prija--y. <br /> - Vegetation be restored an the sever easement. <br /> - hznje the final concept plan shared with the residents- at a. neigh- <br /> borhood meet-ing. <br /> • Mr�eting aejour". d rat 9:15 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.