My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-1976 PTRC Meeting Minutes (2)
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1968-1979
>
1976
>
03-09-1976 PTRC Meeting Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2024 6:32:16 AM
Creation date
8/18/2022 3:04:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
*;inures of Floral Park Neighborhood Meeting <br /> Village of Arden Dills <br /> Tuesday, March 9, 1976 <br /> Village Hall <br /> Present: Committee members, Bob Anderson, Mary Blcmquist, Maureen Cronin, <br /> Cheryl Grudno k.e and Bob G'To)1e. <br /> Also Present: Councilmen Charles Crich--on and killiam Feyereisen and Park <br /> Director, John Buckley. <br /> About 35 neighborhood residents attended this meeting;. <br /> The meeting began with Robert Anderson introducing; John Buckley. Buckley <br /> proceeded to explain the history, basic philosophy and intent of the Arden <br /> Hills Park Committee and continued with the history of Floral Park. <br /> R. Anderson then presented the three concept plans for Floral. Park, prepared <br /> by the University students. The meeting was then opened for questions and <br /> ceents from the residents. <br /> Some concerns of the residents: <br /> - Provisions for policing, park as development proceeds. <br /> - Concerned about park access; wanted major access off Hamline to <br /> • eliminate traffic from Floral Park neighborhood. <br /> - Opposed to large parking lots and roadway through park. <br /> - Concern that development would destroy marsh area in park. There <br /> was an expressed -desire to keep park as natural as possible. <br /> 1, fi c :aCti cau lnaiclYx LiobF:S IL objected to too much development <br /> (ball fields, tennis courts), adjacent to their southern property <br /> line. <br /> Some residents were concerned about PArk boundries. Park property <br /> should be well defined with trees, shrubs and other plantings. <br /> Concern that future walking and bile paths would result in limiting <br /> privacy. <br /> Comments on Park improvement: <br /> - General consensus was that the development should he low key and <br /> gradual. <br /> - Desire for skating and hockey facilities. <br /> - Informal ball field was deslr�ble. <br /> - Park development be planned for the interior of the park to protect <br /> residential privacy. <br /> - Vegetation be restored on the sewer easement. <br /> - Have the final concept plan shared with the residents at a neigh- <br /> borhood meeting. <br /> Fleeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.