My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-03-1986 PTRC Meeting Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
02-03-1986 PTRC Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2024 5:03:36 PM
Creation date
8/25/2022 4:25:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Village of Arden Hills <br /> • Monday, February 3, 1986 - 7:30 p.m. <br /> Village Hall <br /> Call to Order <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn called the meeting <br /> to order at 7:30 p.m. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Present: Mayor Robert Woodburn, Councilmembers Nancy Hansen, Dale <br /> Hicks, Gary Peck, Thomas Sather <br /> Absent: None <br /> Also Present: Engineers Don Christoffersen, Glenn Van Wormer, Barry Peters, <br /> City Planner Orlyn Miller, Treasurer Donald Lamb, Public Works <br /> Supervisor Robert Raddatz, Clerk Administrator Charlotte <br /> McNiesh <br /> Approval of Minutes <br /> Motion was made by Hicks, seconded by Peck, that the minutes of January <br /> 27 be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> Business from the Floor <br /> None <br /> Improvement No. P-85-3, Hamline Avenue, Phase II <br /> Noting that some inaccuracies have appeared in local publications relative <br /> to estimated costs of the proposed Hamline Avenue improvement, Barry <br /> • Peters (SEH) presented to the Council the following summaries: <br /> 46' Roadway $842,095 36' Roadway $731,895 <br /> Surcharging 120,000 120,000 <br /> Sidewalk, west side 34,905 34,905 <br /> $997,000 $886,800 <br /> Sidewalk, east side 18,200 18,200 <br /> $1,015,200 $905,000 <br /> In discussion, Council noted that Parks Committee has recommended a sidewalk <br /> on the east side of Hamline, extending from Karth Lake Circle to Wyncrest; <br /> asked if there is room for one on the right-of-way as planned. Christoffersen <br /> replied that there is an 8' easement; 5' could be used as sidewalk, leaving <br /> a 3' boulevard. <br /> Asked if estimate for 36' roadway included any turn lanes, Christoffersen <br /> said that none were included. <br /> Council further asked if there is a feasible way to discourage cut-through <br /> traffic on Hamline Avenue. Van Wormer stated that the only way to do <br /> so would be to create physical restrictions, which would inconvenience <br /> local traffic as well; he noted that, apparently motorists are finding <br /> it (Hamline) the most expeditious route even in its present condition; <br /> thus would seem hard to discourage. Van Wormer stated he did not anticipate <br /> a great increase in traffic from outside the area after reconstruction; <br /> added that during the reconstruction, some of the motorists currently <br /> using the route will find alternate routes and perhaps not return. <br /> Council asked if warrants are used to determine the need for turn lanes, <br /> as they are for semaphores. . .Van Wormer stated that there are guidelines <br /> given by the State, but not specific "numbers of accidents" or "traffic <br /> counts"; noted that the number of turns at STH 96 and Arden View Court <br /> would far exceed any guidelines given; general advice is whenever there <br /> are three residences or one commercial establishment making a turn, a <br /> turn lane should be provided for safety reasons. <br /> Van Wormer further stated that the Parks Committee had been looking for <br /> cross walks to provide safe crossing east and west across Hamline; his <br /> advice is that the City put in one or two cross walks, providing access <br /> to the parks; past experience has been that motorists would probably <br /> respect one or two cross walks; would not advise over two; City could <br /> thus provide access to Floral and Cummings Park. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.