Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, Page Three <br /> February 3, 1986 <br /> • The motion to amend original motion carried (Sather, Peck, Hicks in favor, <br /> Woodburn, Hansen opposed). <br /> Original motion carried unanimously. (5-0) (Resolution No. 86-8, ORDERING <br /> CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENT NO. P-85-3, AND ORDERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS <br /> THEREFOR. ) <br /> X Feasibility Study - Underground Power Lines or Power Liens on Only One <br /> Side of Hamline Avenue <br /> Council was referred to Parks and Recreation Committee minutes (1/25/86) <br /> recommending a feasibility study re costs of burying lines, or moving <br /> all to one side of Hamline Avenue, to enhance landscaping possibilities <br /> and improve safety. Miller explained that he had given the Parks Committee <br /> a very rough, uneducated estimate of $500,000+ (based on extension of <br /> costs of burying lines on County Road E in 1981); Parks Committee had <br /> felt that, although the cost seemed so high as to make the possibiity <br /> unrealistic, it would like a study made by NSP to obtain a more accurate <br /> figure for discussion. Miller added that, based on past experience, <br /> it would require significantly more research and engineering to determine <br /> cost more definitely. Engineer Christoffersen stated that NSP would <br /> bill the City for the costs of the study. <br /> Mike Lamey, 1349 Colleen, asked where land for burying lines would come <br /> from. Christoffersen stated NSP already has easements; would not require <br /> more land. <br /> • Lorraine Manuel, 4408 Hamline Ave. , expressed opposition to the study <br /> and burying cable if it would add to the special assessment. <br /> Sather noted that the planned improvement of Hamline, to be completed <br /> in 1987, will probably look pretty good; however, in considering aesthetics, <br /> Parks Committee felt it would be in our best interests to have this study; <br /> also felt the underground installation is more free from wind and storm <br /> damage. (It was noted that NSP states that maintenance costs are equal <br /> for either above-ground or below-ground lines, probably because underground <br /> lines are more expensive to service. ) <br /> Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council discontinue any further <br /> studies on costs of putting power lines underground on Hamline Avenue. <br /> Motion carried (Woodburn, Hansen, Peck, Hicks in favor; Sather opposed) <br /> (4-1) <br /> y Tax Forfeited Land, Outlots A and B, Chatham Fourth Addition <br /> Council was referred to Parks and Recreation Committee minutes, (1/25/86) <br /> recommending that Village not acquire these two pieces of tax forfeited <br /> land. In discussion, McNiesh stated that, if the Village does not accept <br /> them, they become State property and the State must maintain them; noted <br /> the School District was contacted several years ago regarding the outlots, <br /> but took no action. Motion was made by Sather, seconded by Peck, that <br /> Council adopt Resolution No. 86-7, APPROVING CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS <br /> OF TAX FORFEITED LAND AS NON-CONSERVATION LANDS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE <br /> THEREOF. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> rt Donation - Picnic Shelter at Hazelnut Park, Aid Association for Lutherans <br /> Council was referred to Parks and Recreation Committee minutes, (1/25/86) <br /> explaining that the Aid Association for Lutherans would like to donate <br /> $2,500 for erection of a Dicnic shelter at Hazelnut Park. Arden Hills <br /> wou nrov e e concrete slab on which it would be erected, at a cost <br /> %r o 1 000, and agree to maintain the shelter after its installation. <br /> U Motion was made by Hicks, seconded by Hansen, that Council accept the <br /> $2,500 donation from the Aid Association for Lutherans, to install the <br /> picnic shelter at Hazelnut Park and authorize the Mayor to execute the <br /> Memorandum of Agreement, and authorize the Parks Department to spend <br /> $1,000 for shelter base. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> �F <br />