My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-28-1986 PTRC Meeting Agenda
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
01-28-1986 PTRC Meeting Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2024 4:56:35 PM
Creation date
8/25/2022 4:29:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Charlotte McNiesh <br /> / Clerk-Administrator <br /> Page Two <br /> December 12 , 1985 <br /> government normally renders. Query whether the City ' s placement <br /> of the proceeds in its Parks and Recreation Fund fits within this <br /> "lawful purpose" . It could be argued, I suppose , that the monies <br /> deposited in the Parks and Recreation Fund will be used for the <br /> erection or acquisition of real property , and, therefore, the <br /> monies derived from the pull-tab operation would not be used for <br /> a "lawful purpose" . I think that the more persuasive argument is <br /> that the placement of monies in the City ' s Parks and Recreation <br /> Fund will lessen the burdens borne by the City and augment and <br /> supplement the recreation services which it renders to its <br /> citizens . The acquisition of real property for parks out of the <br /> Fund would be an indirect, not direct, use of the funds derived <br /> from the pull-tab operation. <br /> Acting conservatively, the City may wish to obtain the <br /> written approval from the Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control <br /> Board of its use of the proceeds from the pull-tab operation. <br /> • The "lawful purpose" exception mentioned above (i.e. , "lawful <br /> purposelldoes not include the erection or acquisition of real <br /> property) can be overcome if the Board authorizes the expenditure <br /> and placement of funds as the City proposes. <br /> As to whether the City will be responsible or liable <br /> for the operation, I could find nothing in Chapter 349 which <br /> creates any liability for the City. It is merely a recipient of <br /> the proceeds. It will not be conducting the operation. <br /> Again , if the City wishes to be cautious , it perhaps <br /> should obtain a letter from St. Joseph' s Society for the Little <br /> Sisters of the Poor which states that the City is merely a <br /> recipient of some of the proceeds derived from St. Joseph' s <br /> pull-tab operation at the Blue Fox Inn , is not a partner of <br /> St. Joseph' s or a joint venturer with it, and is in no manner <br /> involved in conducting the pull-tab operation. The letter should <br /> also state that St. Joseph' s agrees to indemnify, hold harmless <br /> and defend the City against any and all claims , suits, actions , <br /> judgments , charges and fees , including attorneys ' fees and costs , <br /> which in any way might be asserted against the City or accrue to <br /> it as the result of its being a recipient of funds from the <br /> pull-tab operation. Lastly , the letter should state that <br /> St. Joseph' s understands that the City is becoming involved as a <br /> recipient of proceeds from the pull-tab operation conducted by <br /> St. Joseph' s in reliance upon the representations made by <br /> St. Joseph' s in the letter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.