Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, December 28, 1987 <br /> Page 2 <br /> KEM MILLING (Cont'd) Lynden reviewed the timetable for the plant to conduct <br /> . testing, develop alternative solutions for compliance and • <br /> report to Council with plans for improving the odor emission control equipment <br /> before May 1, 1988. He noted the agreement also stated the Company and the City <br /> would reach agreement as to which proposed solution should be implemented by June <br /> 1, 1988, and upon reaching such agreement, the Company agrees to implement the <br /> solution within three months to bring the plant facilities into compliance with <br /> Minnesota Rules. Lynden further advised that he would be discussing this matter <br /> with Kem Milling Company Attorney, Mr. Robert Johnson, who was directly involved <br /> with drafting the MPCA Rules, in January to discuss any changes. <br /> Councilmember Winiecki commented that Jerry Liefert of the MPCA had questioned <br /> the testing criteria; it was suggested that testing be conducted when the plant <br /> is at full production. She suggested that provision be made in the agreement for <br /> the following information to be recorded when testing is done; amount of batch, <br /> cooking time and temperature. <br /> Robert Freed agreed andcommented that such record keeping would be helpful not <br /> only to the City in regulating odor emissions, but also would aid the plant <br /> personnel in finding a solution for eliminating odor emissions. <br /> Tim Guzek, representing Kem Milling, requested Council continuation of this <br /> matter to the next regular Council meeting; he advised his environmental engineer <br /> would be arriving in town next week from Dallas, to review the plant equipment <br /> and attend the committee meeting scheduled on January 7th. Guzek also noted that <br /> the time extension would allow his attorney time to review the proposed <br /> agreement. <br /> • Mayor Woodburn questioned if the plant engineer would be meeting with the MPCA • <br /> representatives; he suggested it would be a good opportunity to arrange such a <br /> meeting and discuss implementation procedures for compliance with MPCA <br /> regulations. <br /> Councilmember Sather questioned if the plant is governed by USDA standards; Guzek <br /> stated the plant is governed by USDA standards. <br /> Dodie Kosticheck, rendering plant committee member, stated it was her opinion the <br /> City has not been responsible to residents demands to alleviate the odor problem; <br /> she commented that the City may be relying too heavily on MPCA to solve the <br /> problem of odor emissions. <br /> Mayor Woodburn disagreed, and advised that this year the City had received more <br /> complaints than in past years; he noted that the City was advised that MPCA <br /> standards for testing odor emissions were being met and Council was advised over <br /> the years that the test results showed compliance with the standards. <br /> Mary Gilles, 1736 Crystal Avenue, stated that she and her neighbors had been <br /> forwarding complaints of the odor emissions over the past several years. <br /> Councilmember Winiecki stated that she had also forwarded complaints to the City <br /> and the MPCA directly; commented that MPCA had responded to the complaints by <br /> stating all that could be done was being done. <br /> Council concurred that they would consider granting the two week continuance of • <br /> • this matter, to allow Guzek time to confer with the plant environmental engineer <br /> and attorney, however, they advised that Guzek should be prepared to address all <br /> issues discussed this evening, as it is the intent of the Council to bring this <br /> matter to a conclusion at the January llth regular Council meeting. <br /> Moved by Sather, seconded by Peck, that the proposed 1988 <br /> agreement with Kem Milling Company be tabled to the next regular Council meeting <br /> to be held on Monday, January 11 , 1988, at 7:30 p.m. , at the Village Hall. Motion <br /> carried. (Sather, Peck and Winiecki voting in favor; Woodburn opposed) (3-1) <br /> 1680 OAK AVE; Council was referred to a letter from Attorney Lynden, <br /> DRAINAGE PROBLEM dated 12-24-87, relative to resolution of the drainage <br /> problem at 1680 Oak Avenue. <br /> • <br />